Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

1.) Staff sleep at the facility while on shift. It was alleged that staff sleep during their shift and that management has not taken any actions towards the issue. Interviews with residents stated that they have not observed staff sleeping while on duty in addition to interviews with staff members who denied the allegation. Interview with the WD, revealed that two (2) staff members have received disciplinary actions for sleeping while on shift within the last year. Based on the information provided by interviews and record review, the above allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time and is considered a technical violation. No citations are being issued at this time, as the facility took the appropriate measures. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. Regarding the allegations: 1.) It was alleged that staff consumed alcohol during their shift at the facility, impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision. Interviews conducted with staff revealed inconsistent statements regarding the allegation. Interview with the ED denied the allegations. Interviews with residents did not reveal any concerns regarding the allegation. The LPAs had conversations with the ED regarding the allegation and explained the importance of maintaining appropriate staff conduct to ensure residents health and safety. The information obtained during the investigation did not include sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. 2.) It was alleged that staff members from the afternoon (PM) shift locked the residents in their rooms. Physical plant tours revealed that Memory Care (MC) rooms cannot be locked without the residents having the ability to unlock the door on their own. The Assisted Living (AL) rooms have individual keys for each resident and can also be unlocked from the inside. Per interview with the ED, the main entrance door locks at night from the outside, however, remains unlocked from the inside. Interviews conducted with staff denied the allegations of staff locking residents inside their rooms. Resident interviews did not reveal any concerns regarding the above allegation. The information obtained during the investigation did not include sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. 3.) Staff did not meet the residents' diapering care needs in a timely manner. It was alleged that residents in MC were left in soiled diapers as a result of MC staff sleeping during their shift. Interviews with WD revealed that once residents press their pendants for assistance, the wait time is approximately 7-10 minutes. Residents interviewed did not express concerns regarding soiled diapers. Staff interviews revealed that wait times vary depending on current tasks, but that they try to assist residents in a timely manner to ensure residents are not in soiled diapers. Staff interviews reveal that for MC residents, they check on residents every 2 hours. The information obtained during the investigation did not include sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87631(a)(3)(A)Type A

    (a) Except as specified in Section 87611(a)…: (3) Residents with a stage one or two pressure injury... (A) The resident shall receive care for the pressure injury from a physician or an appropriately skilled professional.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the Licensee did not comply with the above cited section in that unlicensed staff provided wound care to R1 which poses/posed an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 17, 2025 inspection of VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THE?

This was a complaint inspection of VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THE on December 17, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THE on December 17, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.