Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

SAGE MOUNTAIN SENIOR LIVINGLicense 5658024621 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Resident made to wait an excessive amount of time for assistance The allegation alleges staff do not respond timely to resident requests to use the restroom and response times can be one (1) to two (2) hours long. Pendent call records for all residents for the time period of 06/14/2021 through 06/21/2021 were reviewed. Records reflect on 06/20/2021, seven residents received pendent response times of 22 minutes, 24 minutes, 23 minutes, 37 minutes, 2 hours and 2 minutes, 1 hour and 14 minutes, 34 minutes, 1 hour and 38 minutes and 22 minutes (one resident had three late response times in the same day); on 06/19/2021, one resident had a response time of 34 minutes; on 06/18/2021 two residents had response times of 27 minutes and 29 minutes; on 06/17/2021 five residents had response times of 29 minutes, 30 minutes, 30 minutes, 49 minutes, and 39 minutes; on 06/16/2021 two residents had response times of 22 minutes and 57 minutes; and on 06/14/2021, two residents had response times of 41 minutes and 26 minutes. Resident interviews conducted on 06/21/2021 and on 07/22/2021 revealed five complaints from residents regarding pendent response times. Today on 05/24/2023, the LPA also substantiated a similar complaint received on 06/10/2021 (complaint control # 29-AS-20210610131205) of staff not responding to pendent calls timely. The allegation was substantiated due to record review revealing multiple pendent call wait times observed to be more than 20 minutes during the time period from 05/14/2021 through 06/14/2021 and resident and staff interviews. Based on the information obtained, there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation occurred. Therefore, the allegation of 'Resident made to wait an excessive amount of time for assistance' is deemed Substantiated at this time. The following deficiency was observed (See LIC 9099-D.) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview and report reviewed with Jennifer Miller. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. Allegations: Residents are unable to access facility after hours and Residents' medication and supply deliveries are delayed. The allegation alleges the concierge desk is only staffed until 7:30 PM which results in residents being unable to enter the facility after hours and delaying medication deliveries after hours. At the time the complaint was filed, in an effort to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, the facility locked their perimeter doors from the outside which resulted in staff having to manually open the door for residents, visitors, vendors, etc. Currently, the facility is no longer locking their perimeter doors. Interviews conducted today with Ms. Miller and during previous visits revealed the concierge desk is staffed until 8:00 PM. The facility phone number is also posted on the front door for after hours visitors which the LPA observed today. During after hours, staff carry a portable phone and receive after hour calls directly. Interviews conducted with residents on 06/21/2021 and 07/22/2021 also revealed no issues or concerns regarding gaining access inside the building after hours. One resident stated about six months prior they had a hard time accessing the building when they returned back at 11:00 PM but has had no issues since. Interviews with staff revealed they normally don't get medication deliveries after 8:00 PM but if they did, the delivery person could call the facility directly to get a hold of staff. Based on the information obtained there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations occurred. Therefore, the allegations of 'Residents are unable to access facility after hours and 'Residents' medication and supply deliveries are delayed' are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff doesn't provide care and assistance to residents after hours. The allegation alleges there is only one or two staff on duty after hours and residents are not receiving assistance. A review of the staff schedule for the month of June 2021 revealed two caregivers scheduled during the PM shift and two caregivers scheduled during the NOC shift along with mostly two medication technicians during the PM shift and 1-2 medication technicians during the NOC shift. Interviews with residents revealed although there were complaints of excessive wait times for pendent calls, there was no indication that the wait times were specific to a certain time of day or shift. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation occurred. Therefore, the allegation of 'Staff doesn't provide care and assistance to residents after hours' is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Assist residents with self-administered medication

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the section cited above R1 received their medication late and R1 did not receive their medication due it not being ordered timely which poses an immediate health risk to R1 in care.

  • Right to sufficient care and qualified staff

    87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a)(4)To care, supervision, and services that meet their..needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee failed to comply with the section cited above as three residents (R2, R4, R6) had pendent call wait times in excess of 20 minutes which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 24, 2023 inspection of SAGE MOUNTAIN SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of SAGE MOUNTAIN SENIOR LIVING on May 24, 2023. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to SAGE MOUNTAIN SENIOR LIVING on May 24, 2023?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.