Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

SAGE MOUNTAIN SENIOR LIVINGLicense 5658024622 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Facility has inadequate food service. On the allegation that the facility has inadequate food service; it is the concern of the reporting party that the servers don't wait on residents and when they do, they bring the wrong food. On 05/07/2024, LPA Urena observed lunch in the dining room at approximately 12:15 p.m. Residents were interviewed about the food service and food quality. Ten out of ten residents stated that the food is always good, large portions are served, and when they order room service, the service is on time, and order is correct. Food servers try to serve the meals promptly and are always courteous. Residents stated that food selection has improved because the facility hired recently a new chef. Based on the information gathered through interviews and observation, the allegation that the facility has inadequate food service, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Facility staff are not meeting resident's needs. On the allegation that staff are not meeting the resident’s needs; it is the concern of the resident that the facility has only one caregiver a day to give showers to residents, and a different caregiver every day. LPA Urena interviewed residents about their needs being met, and most of the residents stated that staff are helpful, they assist with showers/baths twice a week. The staff clean their rooms once a week and do their laundry once a week. Based on the information gathered through interviews, the allegation that facility staff are not meeting residents’ needs, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Facility does not provide adequate transportation services : The reporting party’s concern is that the facility does not provide transportation. LPA Urena interviewed residents. Ten out of ten residents stated that the facility does provide transportation services. Residents notify the facility staff about an upcoming appointment, and the residents are dropped off at the appointment place, and if needed the resident may request a companion to go with them to the appointments. At this time the facility has a bus and a company car for the transportation services at this time. Based on the information gathered through interviews, the allegation of inadequate transportation, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No citations were issued. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was issued. Staff do not respond to call pendant in a timely manner. On the allegation that staff do not respond in a timely manner; it is the concern of the reporting party that staff have been taking up to three hours to respond to a pendant call, and the usual wait time is an hour. On 07/25/2023, LPA Lopez interviewed residents and the interviews revealed that staff may respond right away and other times it could take up to 45 minutes to an hour to respond to a pendent call request, but sometimes it may take 2-3 hours to respond, and wait times are longer on the weekend, response times in the mornings are bad and sometimes at night, too. On 05/07/2024, LPA Cortez observed a resident at the front desk requesting assistance with a device, then heard a staff say, “if they call a caregiver, it will take about an hour for the caregiver to respond’, consequently another staff present, helped the resident at the time of the request. On 05/07/2024, LPA Urena interviewed a staff member in regards to the response time for the calls. The staff stated that the goal response time is between 10 to 15 minutes, however if they are busy with another resident, other staff members may assist. When the LPA asked about longer wait times, the staff stated that sometimes the push button may not be fully operating and consequently the staff are not aware of the call button being pushed. Based on the information gathered through interviews, and observation, the allegation that staff do not respond in a timely manner, is deemed Substantiated at this time. Staff does not safeguard resident's personal belongings. On the allegation that staff do not safeguard the resident’s belongings; it is the concern of the reporting party that the staff loses clothes or throws them out without informing the resident. On 05/07/2024, LPA Urena interviewed residents. Five (5) out of 10 residents stated that they don’t have an issue with their laundry or any issues with missing items; five (5) residents stated that clothing items have been lost when staff have washed their clothing. On 07/25/2023, LPA Lopez interviewed staff who stated that some residents have complained about missing laundry and one staff stated that they threw away a piece of clothing that became too soiled to be washed, they attempted to replace the item but was not the right size, consequently had to return the item and get another item. Based on the information received through interviews, the allegation that staff do not safeguard residents’ belongings, is deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations (CCR), the following deficiency is cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Citations were issued. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report and Appeal Rights were issued.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.153(c)(d)Type B

    Theft and loss. (c) Documentation of lost property with a value of twenty-five dollars or more within 72 hours of the discovery of the loss or theft, (d) A written inventory is established … items brought into or removed shall be added to or deleted from the inventory. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, the licensee failed to make reasonable efforts to safeguard a resident’s property, as the facility lost clothing items, which poses a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.

  • Right to sufficient care and qualified staff

    Residents…have all of the following personal rights: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers...and competency to meet their needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section, as the licensee did not ensure resident’s call buttons were responded to timely which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 7, 2024 inspection of SAGE MOUNTAIN SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of SAGE MOUNTAIN SENIOR LIVING on May 7, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to SAGE MOUNTAIN SENIOR LIVING on May 7, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "Theft and loss. (c) Documentation of lost property with a value of twenty-five dollars or more within 72 hours of the di..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.