Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

VENTURA VILLA ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 5658500931 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

It is alleged that the ‘Staff are not properly trained to administer residents’ medications. The concern of the RP is that employees are asked to give medicines to residents, but the employees are not certified to pass the medicine. To investigate the allegation LPA Cortez interviewed staff, the Office Manager, and conducted a file review. Staff interviews revealed that caregivers pass out medications to residents when there is no MedTech (MT) available. The Administrator stated that the caregivers who pass out medications to residents when the MedTechs are not available have been trained by one of the facilities MedTechs on how to pass the medication. However, there was no documentation on medication training available for the LPA to review for the caregivers that are passing out medications. On 1/09/24, during the initial 10-day complaint visit the Office Manager provided the LPA a certification of completion of 24 hours medication training program for four (4) MedTech’s at the facility. One out of the four MT’s no longer works at the facility. Furthermore, the certificates do not have any additional information other than the instructor’s signature. The Administrator stated that a pharmacist had come out to give the medication training, however could not provide additional information of the consultant such as the address, and telephone number of the consultant, the date when consultation was provided, the consultant’s organization affiliation, if any, and any educational and professional qualifications specific to medication management and, the training topics for which consultation was provided. Based on the information gathered through the interviews and documentation the allegation is Substantiated at this time. During the visit Office Manager Angelica Arambulo left the facility and assigned MedTech Dora Islas to review and sign the report . Per California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, see LIC 9099-D for deficiencies cited. . A copy of the report was issued, along with appeal rights. It is alleged that a ‘Resident sustained unexplained bruising’. The concern of the RP is that a resident sustained bruising and the RP does not think anyone reported this information. During this investigation LPA Cortez conducted interviews with Resident #1, facility staff, and a family member of the resident. In addition, R1’s medical records and facility records were reviewed. Information revealed that R1 had an un-witnessed fall in the room on 10/20/23, was taken to hospital for evaluation. Facility submitted an Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC624) to CCL on 10/22/23. R1 was diagnosed with a fall, contusions, facial hematoma, and dementia. The bruises could be from that fall. The general information also states the risk of falling is higher in older people, R1 ambulates most of the time. During LPA's interview with R1, it was learned that R1 is confused and cannot hold a conversation. There is no indication or evidence identified that R1 may have been physically abused. Interview with R1's family indicates that they are happy with the care being provided to R1 and have no concerns at this time. R1 is still residing at the same facility. Based on the information gathered through the interviews and file review there is insufficient evidence to support the above allegation. Therefore, although the allegation may have happened, or may be valid, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It is alleged that the ‘Facility is not supplying adequate food service’. The concern of the RP is that residents are not being provided snacks at night when asked for and are given hard bread. LPA Cortez interviewed residents, staff, and Office Manager, and conducted a tour of the kitchen. Interview with residents revealed that residents are being provided with snacks if requested. Residents stated that they also have snacks in their rooms. Interviews with facility staff revealed that snacks are available for residents such as fruit, yellow, and yogurt. Furthermore, staff stated that sandwiches and other items such as apple sauce are left in the staff refrigerator at night in case there’s residents that request food after the kitchen is closed. Interview with the Office Manager revealed that residents are provided with three meals a day, and two snacks, and additional snacks during activities. The administrator also stated that most residents don’t typically ask for food at night, however that staff is aware of what residents may be up at night wondering and have snacks available for them. During the tour of the kitchen, the LPA observed the refrigerator stocked with vegetables, fruit, yogurt, ice cream, milk, juice, and other foods. The freezer was stocked with frozen meats, and other frozen foods. Based on the information gathered through the interviews and observations there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that residents are not provided with adequate food service. Therefore, although the allegation may have happened, or may be valid, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Report will continue on LIC9099-C... It is alleged that the ‘Staff failed to provide a comfortable environment for residents’. The concern of the RP is that residents wear bibs to clean their faces, but when they do the laundry, they wash the bibs with the mop's rugs, and that residents are dressed in clothes not appropriate for the weather. Furthermore, it was alleged that resident #2 always gets cold water in the house. To investigate the allegation LPA Cortez interviewed residents, staff, and conducted a tour of the laundry room and R2’s room. Residents stated that they are treated well at the facility and have no concerns. Staff interviews revealed that bibs are not washed with the mop’s rugs and that residents are dressed in sweaters and jackets during the cold weather. The LPA observed residents wearing sweaters/jackets and observed some residents also with blankets. During the tour of the laundry room, the LPA observed bibs in the washing machine, however the LPA did not observe any mop’s rugs in the washing machine with bibs. Lastly, at 1:18 p.m. the LPA measured the hot water in R2’s restroom at 115.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Based on the information gathered through the interviews and observations there is insufficient evidence to support the above allegation. Therefore, although the allegation may have happened, or may be valid, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. During the visit Office Manager Angelica Arambulo left the facility and assigned MedTech Dora Islas to review and sign the report. Exit interview conducted and report was issued.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.69Type B

    §1569.69(a) (1) In facilities licensed to provide care for 16 or more persons, the employee shall complete 24 hours of initial training. This training shall consist of 16 hours of hands-on shadowing training,...and 8 hours of other training or instruction,...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee failed to comply with the section cited above as caregivers without complete medication training are passing medications, & training consultants inormation was not available which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 25, 2024 inspection of VENTURA VILLA ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of VENTURA VILLA ASSISTED LIVING on January 25, 2024. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to VENTURA VILLA ASSISTED LIVING on January 25, 2024?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "§1569.69(a) (1) In facilities licensed to provide care for 16 or more persons, the employee shall complete 24 hours of i..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.