Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

REGENCY PALMS OXNARDLicense 565850112
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegation: 1.) Due to lack of supervision, resident was pushed by another resident causing the resident to fall. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was pushed by another resident (name unknown) causing R1 to fall. Interviews conducted with staff on 11/20/2024 and 02/25/2025 denied witnessing another resident push R1. However, one (1) out of fifteen (15) staff interviewed, Staff #1 (S1) stated that they have witnessed R1 being pushed by Resident #2 (R2) causing R1 to fall. S1 stated that they do not recall when this occurred and that they reported the incident to management. Per record review, there was no documentation of the alleged incident. Interview with the ED denied the allegation and stated that it is rare that residents push each other. The ED explained that care staff are trained to redirect residents when a resident is aggressive. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: 2.) Due to staff neglect, resident fell while being changed by staff causing the resident to sustain a bruise. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) fell while being changed by staff causing a bruise on R1’s face in November 2024. Per Unusual Incident/ Injury Report dated 11/10/2024, on 11/06/2024, R1 fell off R1’s bed as two (2) caregivers were assisting R1 with dressing. Per the report, 911 was called and R1 was transported to the Emergency Room (ER). Per hospital records, R1 was admitted to the hospital from 11/06/2024 with the reason for admission listed as “fall and subdural hematoma” and was discharged on 11/12/2024. Per interviews with staff and record review, R1 was transferred and admitted to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) on 11/12/2024 with the principal diagnosis of “Traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, subsequent encounter.” Per record review, R1 had a previous fall on 10/15/2024 in which R1 was hospitalized and had computed tomography (CT) scans due to R1 having a facial contusion from the fall. R1’s fall from October 2024 was the source of R1’s facial bruise, not from R1’s fall on November 6, 2024. Interviews with staff revealed that R1 would often make themselves fall or be uncooperative while staff assisted with R1’s Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The interview with the ED revealed that staff have been retrained on ADLs and in overall resident care. Concerns and deficiencies regarding R1’s care are being addressed with a Case Management Deficiencies report. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation as R1 already had a facial bruise from a previous fall. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87463(a)Type B

    87463 Reappraisals (a) The pre-admission appraisal...shall be updated in writing as frequently as necessary... whichever occurs first...appraisal shall be referred to as the reappraisal.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and observation, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section, as R1’s care plan was not updated as necessary after significant change in condition which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87464(f)(4)Type A

    87464 Basic Services (f) (4) Personal assistance and care as needed by the resident and as indicated in the pre-admission appraisal, with those activities of daily living such as dressing, eating, bathing and assistance...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section as staff did not properly assist R1 while dressing which resulted in R1 falling, and sustaining injury which posed an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 14, 2025 inspection of REGENCY PALMS OXNARD?

This was a complaint inspection of REGENCY PALMS OXNARD on August 14, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to REGENCY PALMS OXNARD on August 14, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.