Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

REGENCY PALMS OXNARDLicense 5658501121 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegation: 1.) Staff do not ensure that outside vendors are not video recording/taking pictures of residents in care. It was alleged that an outside vendor hired by the facility took videos of residents and posted it on social media without consent from the residents. The complainant is alleging that the videos posted are a privacy violation towards residents. Interview the Activity Director (AD), Sarina Espinosa confirmed that an outside vendor did perform at the facility on February 26th, 2026. Interview with AD revealed that majority of residents have signed consent forms for photographs. The AD explained that the vendor reached out to them to perform, as the vendor had already performed at the facility’s other location. The AD explained that she did not sign the vendor’s disclaimer regarding residents being recorded and the possibility of the videos being uploaded to the vendors social media accounts. The LPA reviewed the vendor’s social media, specifically Instagram and noted that the vendor posted six (6) videos of their performance at the facility since February 27th, 2026. The videos are of the vendor singing and dancing with residents. In the videos, the vendor is singing inappropriate jokes. One video posted on March 4, 2026, the vendor said the following “We moving we grooving falling and bruising” and “Got pain all in ur neck? In ur back? In your crack?” The AD stated that the residents appeared to be enjoying the performance. The AD and Interim ED were not aware that the videos of the performance and residents were posted onto the vendors social media accounts. The LPA had a conversation with the AD regarding personal rights and appropriate entertainment for the residents. The AD stated that going forward she will ensure that all outside vendors are appropriate for the residents. Based on interviews and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation, “Staff do not ensure that outside vendors are not video recording/taking pictures of residents in care” is deemed Substantiated at this time. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiency was observed and cited during the visit (See 9099-D). Exit interview conducted with Interim Executive Director (ED) Stephani Smith. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87613(a)(2)Type B

    87613(a)(2)General Requirements for Restricted Health Conditions (2)Ensure that facility staff complete training provided by a licensed professional…training shall be completed prior to the staff providing services to the resident. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as staff assist residents with a hoyer lift prior to getting training by a skilled professional, which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(3)Type B

    87468.1(a) (3)Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities(a)Residents in all residential care facilities... (3)To be free from punishment, humiliation... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as the facility staff did ensure that residents were free from humiliation as an outside vendor posted videos of the residents online which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(1)Type A

    87468.1(a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as S1 was observed to be rude or aggressive towards residents which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 9, 2026 inspection of REGENCY PALMS OXNARD?

This was a complaint inspection of REGENCY PALMS OXNARD on April 9, 2026. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to REGENCY PALMS OXNARD on April 9, 2026?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87613(a)(2)General Requirements for Restricted Health Conditions (2)Ensure that facility staff complete training provide..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.