Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

VARENITA OF WESTLAKELicense 565850150
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The complaint alleges that Staff #1 (S1) was rough with Resident #1 (R1) and that S1 hit R1 with an unknown object while putting R1 to bed. LPA interviewed staff and R1, as well as R1’s family member related to the allegation and reviewed facility documents. Staff interview revealed that on the date of the alleged incident, R1 was having a rough night. R1 was agitated and was hitting the facility staff, including S1. R1 also reported to the police on the night of the incident that R1 had hit S1 in the stomach. R1 showed the police an injury which was reportedly caused by S1 that night, however police noted the injury “appeared to be a scab that was scraped off from a pre-existing injury.” Resident observations indicate that R1 had a fall on 04/16/2024, which resulted in a skin tear to R1’s left leg and small scrape to R1's right leg. Staff notes continue to mention the skin tear somewhat regularly and on 05/24/2024, the skin tear is referred to as “old skin tear” on R1’s right leg. The alleged incident occurred on 06/02/2024 and police noted the injury appeared to be an old picked off scab. LPA observed R1’s left leg during the initial visit and took photographs of the injury, which was scabbed over at that time. Physician’s report reviewed indicates R1 has a diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment. LPA interviewed R1, who initially told LPA that an injury to their leg was caused while R1 was on a boat when the mast hit them in the leg. Later in the interview, R1 indicated the injury was caused by S1 hitting them with a stick, resulting in a cracked kneecap. The injury was noted to be on R1’s left lower leg, not R1’s kneecap. LPA interviewed R1’s family member related to the incident, who stated they were unsure if “it’s happened, imagined, or if [R1] dreamed it.” Staff and R1’s family member stated that R1 has been experiencing confusion and sundowning recently. LPA requested a copy of a police report from the night of the incident, however, the police did not make a written report. Based on interview and record review, although the allegations may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations or that a violation occurred, therefore, the allegations “Staff handled resident in a rough manner” and “Staff hit resident with unknown object” are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.625(b)(1)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that six (6) of six (6) staff were missing 40 hours initial and 20 hours annual training which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87355(e)Type A

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that two (2) staff members did not have a transfer of criminal record clearance which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87411(c)(1)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that three (3) out of six (6) staff did not have First Aid training which poses a potential health and safety rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87705(f)Type B

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that cleaning solutions and scissors were stored accessible to residents with dementia which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 16, 2024 inspection of VARENITA OF WESTLAKE?

This was a complaint inspection of VARENITA OF WESTLAKE on September 16, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to VARENITA OF WESTLAKE on September 16, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.