Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

OAKMONT OF RIVERPARKLicense 565850168
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Report continued from LIC9099.... On the allegations, “Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident, Facility staff refused to assist resident with mobility, Facility staff refused to assist resident with dressing”; it was alleged that two (2) staff (S1, S2) called Resident 1 (R1) “fat”, “heavy”, and “disgusting,” refused to help R1 with mobility issues such as getting out of bed and refused to help change their clothes. Date was not provided. Interview conducted with R1 on 11/29/2023 revealed that they were confronted by a couple of workers in a mean way, staff told R1 to get ready and get dressed, however R1 is not able to do it by themselves. R1 further revealed that they have a problem with their memory and could not remember their names. Interviews conducted with staff revealed that S1 is no longer at the community and there is no staff with the name provided for S2 currently working at the community or during the time the complaint was submitted in November of 2023. All care staff denied speaking to any resident inappropriately and denied they have refused to assist residents. Three (3) out of thirteen (13) staff interviewed revealed that R1 voiced concerns to them about the above allegations, and have observed similar behavior from staff, however, all thirteen (13) staff revealed that they did not witness the noted allegations. Six (6) residents interviewed revealed that they have never been denied assistance or talked to inappropriately by any staff. On the allegations, “Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident, Facility staff refused to assist resident with mobility, Facility staff refused to assist resident with dressing”; information gathered from interviews revealed that all care staff denied allegations, there is no staff by the name provided for S2, R1 could not remember the names of the staff when interviewed by the LPA, there were no witnesses, and six (6) other residents interviewed revealed they had no concerns. Based on interviews, although the allegation may be valid, at this time, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred, therefore, the allegations above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. Today's report was reviewed and emailed to the Executive Director.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(1)Type B

    Personal Rights. Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff,. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when 6 out of 10 staff are voicing concerns regarding the treatment of the residents by staff which poses an immediate personal rights risk to residents in care.

  • 87303(a)(1)Type A

    87303(a)(1) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. (1) Floor surfaces in bath, laundry and kitchen areas shall be maintained in a clean, sanitary, and odorless condition. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on photos and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as R1 was left in their room overnight with fire-extinguisher powder all over the room which posed an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87705(f)(1)Type B

    87705(f)(1) Care of Persons with Dementia (f) The following shall be stored inaccessible to residents with dementia: (1) Knives, matches, firearms, tools and other items that could constitute a danger to the resident(s). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as R1 had access to fire extinguisher, despite staff knowing that grabbing the fire extinguisher was a known behavior of R1, which posed a potential safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 23, 2024 inspection of OAKMONT OF RIVERPARK?

This was a complaint inspection of OAKMONT OF RIVERPARK on December 23, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to OAKMONT OF RIVERPARK on December 23, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.