Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

OAKMONT OF CAMARILLOLicense 565850169
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

unit. During both the initial complaint visit and the subsequent complaint visit, upon arrival at the facility, LPA observed beverage options in the facility’s Bistro, including ice water, lemon water, coffee, decaf coffee, and hot water for various tea choices. The facility also contains a lounge/bar area, which is open daily during designated hours and contains both alcoholic and non-alcoholic drink options. In the dining room, which is available throughout the day and evening, there are multiple choices for beverages, including but not limited to sodas, juices, coffee, hot and iced tea, as well as milk. Water is also available in the activity room and on each medication cart, as well as available bottled water. Residents throughout Assisted Living have access to water in their rooms, in both their bathroom sink, as well as kitchenette (if the unit is so supplied.) R1’s room was observed to contain bottles of Arrowhead water in a cabinet above their sink. R1 also had a mug available for use in their room. R1’s refrigerator, which is stocked by either the resident or their family, was observed to be empty at the time of the initial visit. Interview with R1 revealed they do have access to beverages at meals as well as between meals. Interview with staff revealed that although R1 is not observed utilizing the Bistro often, they are aware beverages are available throughout the facility. Other residents interviewed indicated the facility provides beverages to meet their needs. Based on interview and observation, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation, therefore the allegation that “staff do not provide residents with adequate beverages” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation: “Staff do not treat residents with dignity:” The complaint alleges that R1 indicated that “people are mean” at the facility. During the initial complaint investigation, LPA interviewed R1 for additional details. R1 indicated staff are nice to her and the other residents and does not recall anyone being mean to her. Other residents interviewed indicated the staff are all kind, courteous and helpful. No residents have observed any instances where residents were not treated with dignity. Staff interviews also revealed that residents are treated well, there have been no reports to their knowledge of any residents being mistreated and they have not witnessed any incidents related to residents’ dignity. Staff did indicate that occasionally there are incidents where residents have been unkind to one another, but they encourage the residents to speak amongst themselves with respect and work through any concerns they may have. Staff do intervene when necessary. Based on interview and observation, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation, therefore the allegation that “staff do not treat residents with dignity” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of today’s report was provided via email.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.2(a)(20)Type B

    87468.2 (a) (20) To be protected from involuntary transfers, discharges, and evictions...protections for residents. For purposes of this paragraph, "involuntary" means a transfer, discharge, or eviction that is initiated by the licensee, not by the resident.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the facility did not comply with the above cited section, as R1 was asked to leave the facility following their 4th elopement and was not permitted to return to the facility without a 1:1 which had proven unsucessful, which posed a potential personal rights risk to R1.

  • 87464(f)(c)(1)Type A

    87464 Basic services (f)(1)(c) "Care and supervision" means the facility assumes responsibility for...ongoing assistance with activities of daily living without which the resident’s physical health, mental health, safety, or welfare would be endangered.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility did not comply with the above cited section as R1 was able to leave the facility unassisted multiple times and management stated they could not meet R1's care needs, which posed an immediate risk to residents' safety.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 6, 2024 inspection of OAKMONT OF CAMARILLO?

This was a complaint inspection of OAKMONT OF CAMARILLO on May 6, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to OAKMONT OF CAMARILLO on May 6, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.