Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

OAKMONT OF CAMARILLOLicense 565850169
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: “Facility staff are not assisting with self-administration of medications as prescribed:” The complaint alleges that the facility staff are not assisting Resident #1 (R1) with their prescribed medications. LPA reviewed medications, Medication Administration Records (MAR), Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (CSMDR), and Controlled Drug Record for R1. Record review revealed that pill #29, 27, 26, and 20 of R1’s Oxycodone-Acetaminophen were not properly documented on the Controlled Drug Record as there is no date and/or time listed that the pills were administered. Additionally, controlled drug record indicates “take 1 tab by mouth every day at 8:30AM, however, on 06/02/2022 the medication was given at 08:30AM, pill #29 was likely also administered on 06/02, however the date, time, and signature are missing. Also on 06/02/2022, staff signed that R1 took pill #28 at 12:30AM, however this could not be possible if pill #30 was administered at 08:30AM as prescribed. Additional entries include times varying from 06:00 (presumably AM), 12:30 (unclear if AM or PM), to 07:00PM. However, this document only indicates it is intended for the 08:30AM medication. Physician’s orders for R1 as well as MAR indicate R1’s Oxycodone-APAP 10/325mg is prescribed “take 1 tablet by mouth every 3 hours as needed for moderate-severe pain.” MAR indicates this medication was administered on the following dates: 2X on 06/01/2022, 3X on 06/02/2022, 06/03/2022, 06/04/2022, 06/05/2022. Then under a separate line with no prescription number marked, the medication was administered on the following dates: 2X on 06/17/2022, 06/19/2022 and 06/21/2022. Under another prescription number and a 3 rd line, the medication was administered 2X on 06/20/2022. It is unclear why the medication is documented on multiple line items and the electronic record does not accurately reflect the manually written Controlled Drug Administration Record. Additionally, interviews revealed that on at least one occasion, the medication technician delivered R1’s medications to their room and left the medications in the room for R1’s private caregiver to administer to R1. R1’s private caregiver reported that one time 2 pills of the same medication were brought and left for R1 in the room, when only 1 pill was prescribed at that time. Had R1 self-administered this medication as prepared by the medication technician, R1 would have been administered twice the prescribed dose. Based on interview and record review, the allegation “facility staff are not assisting with self-administration of medications as prescribed” is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. As R1 was also listed in Complaint Control # 29-AS-20220422121330, this allegation was addressed, and citation was issued under this referenced complaint, no citation will be issued during today’s visit. Allegation: “Medications are not being refilled timely:” The complaint alleges that medications for R1 were not refilled timely, resulting in R1’s furosemide 20mg Report Continued on LIC 9099-C 20mg tablet not able to be administered for 2 days. R1’s MAR indicates that RX#1931532 had a stop date of 06/10/2022. Beginning with the 05:00PM dose of that medication and continuing through the 08:00AM dose on 06/12/2022, the MAR indicates exceptions stating “withheld per DR/RN orders.” R1’s MAR also indicates RX#1940373 was written on 06/10/2022. Under this prescription number, the medication does not show as administered until the 08:00AM dose on 06/15/2022 even though the prescription has an orig date of 06/10/2022. According to R1’s MAR review, R1’s furosemide 20mg tablet was not administered from 05:00PM on 06/10/2022 until 08:00AM on 06/15/2022. Staff interviewed indicated that medication technicians should be calling for refills on medications when there are approximately 8 pills remaining, but this was not always completed per policy. Staff indicated that at times R1’s medications were not refilled timely and R1 was therefore unable to receive their prescribed medications. Based on record review and interview, the allegation “medications are not being refilled timely” is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. As R1 was also listed in Complaint Control # 29-AS-20220422121330, this allegation was addressed, and citation was issued under this referenced complaint, no citation will be issued during today’s visit. Allegation: “Facility staff did not respond timely to resident's request for assistance:” The complaint alleges that R1 was given a pendant that did not function properly, resulting in R1 experiencing long wait times when R1 requested assistance. LPA reviewed CarePoint Server Console Page Report for R1 for period of 06/08/2022 to 06/20/2022. LPA noted there were 144 total calls for assistance during this time period. Of those calls, response time ranged from 45 seconds to 1 hour, 59 minutes, 16 seconds. Interviews revealed that an acceptable call response is from 10-15 minutes maximum. LPA counted a total of 28 times during the designated time period that R1’s call response time was greater than 15 minutes. Interviews revealed that R1 did request assistance frequently, either to request PRN (as needed) medications or for transfer assistance and that sometimes residents have to wait for assistance, particularly during busy time periods. Residents interviewed also indicated at times they have to wait too long when they need assistance. Based on record review and interview, the allegation that “facility staff did not respond timely to resident’s request for assistance” is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. As this allegation was also listed in Complaint Control # 29-AS-20220323121610 related to R1 and both complaints were investigated concurrently, citation was issued under this referenced complaint and no citation will be issued related to this allegation during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided via email. Allegation: “Facility staff are not properly assisting resident with transfers:” The complaint alleges that facility staff did not properly assist R1 with transfers to the commode, resulting in R1 falling. Interviews revealed that R1 does call most nights/early morning time and request to be transferred to the commode. Staff interviewed indicated that R1 has begun buckling their legs during transfers, which makes transferring R1 more difficult. Staff stated that this is what has been happening recently, which has resulted in staff having to lower R1 to the floor. Interview also revealed that some staff and private caregiver are able to safely assist R1 with transfers with only 1 person present, but due to the buckling of their legs, staff are ensuring that R1 is transferred with 2 staff present only. Resident assessment dated 08/27/2021 indicates R1 “requires one person physical assistance with transfers” and “resident has not fallen within the past year.” LPA reviewed incident reports for the indicated time period and there were no incident reports indicating R1 had fallen. Based on interview and record review, although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation had occurred, therefore, the allegation “facility staff are not properly assisting resident with transfers” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No citations issued related to the above allegation. Exit interview conducted. A copy of today’s report was provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(a)(4)Type B

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility... by compliance with the following:(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section, as residents' medications were not refilled timely and not avaiable, as well as other medications not documented as administered as prescribed, which posed a potential health risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 28, 2024 inspection of OAKMONT OF CAMARILLO?

This was a complaint inspection of OAKMONT OF CAMARILLO on May 28, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to OAKMONT OF CAMARILLO on May 28, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.