Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

OAKMONT OF SIMI VALLEYLicense 565850291
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Staff stated that meals typically include a variety of options such as scrambled eggs, soups, sandwiches, various proteins, salads, and other entrees requested by residents. None of the staff reported observing any food that appeared to be unappetizing or lacking in nutritional value. During the visit LPA observed that the main kitchen was adequately stocked with fresh fruits, as well as other perishable and non-perishable food items. All food was properly stored. In addition, interviews were conducted with three (3) family members or responsible parties of current residents. None of the individuals interviewed expressed any immediate or potential concerns regarding the quality of the food or the food service at this time. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Residents in care are not provided proper meal service” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was reported that "Staff did not follow proper personal hygiene protocols", as it was alleged that staff are not washing their hands, not wearing gloves and hair nets when serving food. Interviews were conducted with eight (8) staff members revealed all eight (8) reported that staff consistently follow proper hygiene protocols. None of the individuals interviewed could recall any instance where food was served to residents without proper hand hygiene being observed. Additionally, no concerns were raised by staff regarding any current issues with hand hygiene practices. During physical plant tours conducted on 03/14/2025 and 04/14/2025 during lunch service, the LPA  observed that all staff were wearing appropriate attire while serving food to residents. Interviews were also conducted with three (3) family members or responsible parties of residents in care. None of the individuals interviewed reported any immediate or potential concerns related to staff hygiene practices at this time. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff did not follow proper personal hygiene protocols” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was reported that "Staff did not provide adequate laundry services to residents", as it was alleged that due to staff negligence,  laundry is piled high  in multiple locations and residents are often returned the wrong clothes. Interviews were conducted with eight (8) staff members revealed, six (6) out of the eight (8) reported that they have not observed a significant accumulation of laundry in resident rooms or in the laundry area. Two (2) staff members stated they had observed large amounts of laundry on a few occasions; however, they noted this had not occurred since the beginning of the year. These staff attributed the temporary buildup to instances where multiple residents had soiled their bedding overnight. All eight (8) staff members confirmed that, while residents’ clothing can occasionally be mixed up, such occurrences are rare. Staff reported being familiar with which clothing items belong to which residents, helping minimize such issues. A review of facility records  showed that laundry is typically completed by the morning shift for residents scheduled to receive showers. The PM and NOC (night) shifts complete laundry for residents not served during the morning or according to the facility's established laundry schedule. During physical plant tours conducted on 03/14/2025 and 04/14/2025, the LPA did not observe any excessive or uncollected laundry on the memory care floor. Additionally, interviews with three (3) family members or responsible parties of residents in care revealed that none of them expressed any current or potential concerns regarding the adequacy of laundry services. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff did not provide adequate laundry services to residents” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was reported that "Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents" as it was alleged that staff oftentimes leave windows open in residents rooms at night. Interviews with eight (8) staff members indicated that none had observed any windows left open overnight or for an extended period without a resident’s request. Staff reported that, as part of their routine, both the PM and NOC (night) shifts conduct joint walk-through of resident rooms before residents go to sleep. During these checks, staff confirm that trash is not overflowing, windows are secured, and residents’ needs are being met. Interviews with three (3) family members or responsible parties of residents revealed that none expressed any immediate or potential concerns regarding staff maintaining a comfortable indoor temperature for residents at this time. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report issued.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 14, 2025 inspection of OAKMONT OF SIMI VALLEY?

This was a complaint inspection of OAKMONT OF SIMI VALLEY on April 14, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to OAKMONT OF SIMI VALLEY on April 14, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.