Skip to main content

On this page

Public Record

Alma Care Senior Living Llc

License 565850505Residential Care - ElderlyThousand Oaks, CA
29 citations on record

Is this your facility?Correct anything the record gets wrong or is out of date.

Researching this facility professionally?Book a 15-minute call

Share this facilityTwitterLinkedInEmail

About this facility

Operating details and county context

Operating details

Capacity
3 residents
Phone
(805) 331-8320
Address
814 E. Avenida De Los Arboles
Licensed since

Ventura County context

253*CCLD

Total facilities

5.5*CCLD

Avg citations

9.3*CCLD

Avg visits

3.3*CCLD

Avg complaint visits

*CCLD: California Community Care Licensing Division. Updated weekly. Last refresh .

Citations

29 citations on record

Every regulation cited on a CCLD inspection of this facility, sourced from the public record. Each row links to the visit’s inspector narrative.

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468(c)Type B

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the required posting was not posted at the time of the visit which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87307(e)(2)(A)Type A

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one (1) gate that has access to the pool was not properly locked which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87355(k)Type A

    Based on observation, and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in Volunteer #1 was not associated to the facility which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87411(d)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one (1) of two (2) staff did not have the required training which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87412(b)Type B

    Based on (record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two (2) of two (2) staff did not have the above listed document which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87412(c)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one (1) of two (2) staff did not have the required training which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87465(h)(2)Type B

    Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one staff medication (Ozempic) was not left in the accessible refrigerator which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87465(h)(4)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in Resident #2 medication (MIRTAZAPINE 15 MG) was not documented correctly and did not have the medication rx number listed which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(4)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one (1) of two (2) residents did not have the required document signed and in their file which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87468(c)(1)Type B

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the required posting was not posted at the time of the visit which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87468(c)(2)(A)Type B

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the required posting was not posted at the time of the visit which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care and send proof to LPA.

  • 87468(d)Type B

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the required posting was not posted at the time of the visit which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87613(a)(2)(B)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one (1) of two (2) staff did not have the required training which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.157(h)Type B

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the required posting was not posted at the time of the visit which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.158(d)Type B

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the required posting was not posted at the time of the visit which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.267(d)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one (1) of two (2) staff did not have the required training which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care and send proof to LPA.

  • 1569.618(b)(3)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in as the staff roster did not indicate another on call staff which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.625(b)(1)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one (1) of two (2) staff did not have the required training which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.626(a)(1)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one (1) of two (2) staff did not have the required training which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.626(a)(2)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one (1) of two (2) staff did not have the required training which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.69(a)(2)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one (1) of two (2) staff did not have the required training which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care and send proof to LPA.

  • 87415(a)(1)Type B

    Based on record review], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in no staff was indicated on the staff rsoter which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87465(d)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two (2) of two (2) residents did not have PRN letters which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87465(f)(1)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two (2) of two (2) reisdents did not have the following which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87470(c)(1)(C)1Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one (1) of two (2) staff did not have the appropriate training which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87212(c)Type B

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in Emergency exiting plans and telephone numbers were not posted at the time of the visit which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87309(a)Type B

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two (2) packs of matches and one (1) lighter was accessible to residents in care which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87412(a)(11)Type B

    Based on (record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two (2) of two (2) staff did not have the above listed document which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87468(c)(2)Type B

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the required posting was not posted at the time of the visit which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Inspection record

3 visits on record since 2024. Most recent on 2025-07-31.

1 routine inspection.

29 citations across the record on file

Nearby

Other licensed assisted living facilities in Thousand Oaks

FAQ

Common questions about this facility

Is Alma Care Senior Living Llc licensed in California?

Yes, Alma Care Senior Living Llc is currently licensed in California. It has been licensed since 2024.

How many citations does Alma Care Senior Living Llc have?

Alma Care Senior Living Llc has 29 citations on record: 2 Type A (more serious) and 27 Type B citations. It has received 3 visits (1 inspection, 2 other visits).

When was Alma Care Senior Living Llc last inspected?

Alma Care Senior Living Llc was last inspected on July 31, 2025 (about 11 months ago). California inspects licensed assisted living facilities (RCFEs) on a periodic basis or following a complaint.

What type of assisted living facility is Alma Care Senior Living Llc?

Alma Care Senior Living Llc is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE), which is a licensed assisted living facility serving older adults with a licensed capacity of 3 residents. It is located in Thousand Oaks, Ventura County, California.

How does Alma Care Senior Living Llc compare to other assisted living facilities in Ventura County?

Alma Care Senior Living Llc has 29 citations. The county average is 5.5 citations per facility. There are 253 assisted living facilities in Ventura County.

Does Alma Care Senior Living Llc have any serious violations?

Alma Care Senior Living Llc has 2 Type A citations on record. Type A citations indicate conditions that pose an immediate health or safety risk to residents. Review the inspection timeline above for details on each citation.

Next steps for this record

If this is your facility,and correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.