Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

VARENITA OF SIMI VALLEYLicense 567610007
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo conducted a Case Management - Incident visit to follow up on a self-reported incident which took place on 02/25/2026. Upon arrival the LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Helen Lee and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. On 02/26/2026, the Department received an incident report (LIC 624) and SOC 341 regarding Resident #1 (R1) reporting to concierge at approximately 12:00 p.m., that Resident #2 (R2) had hit them in the face yesterday (02/25/2026) at lunch time in the dining room. Report states that incident was reported by R1 and was unwitnessed by any staff member. During today’s visit, between approximately 9:20 a.m. and 11:30 a.m., the LPA conducted interviews with the ED and three residents and reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documents. No immediate health and safety concerns were observed during today’s visit. Interviews revealed that R1 reported the incident to the concierge the day after the alleged incident. R1 stated that R2 had been calling them names for several weeks. R1 reported feeling tired of hearing R2 call them names and stated that they stood up and placed both hands in front of R2. According to R1, R2 then slapped them in the face with an open palm. Report Continued on LIC 809C... Report Continued from LIC 809... An interview with R2 revealed that they only referred to R1 as the name of the city they were from. R2 stated that when R1 raised their hands in front of their face, their reaction was to push R1 away. R2 denied calling R1 any other names. R2 also denied hitting R1 in the face and expressed regret for anything that may have occurred that day. An interview with another resident, who is a mutual friend of both R1 and R2, revealed that although R2 may occasionally make rude comments to others, they have never witnessed R2 behave aggressively toward anyone while residing at the facility. The ED stated that they checked R1 for any visible marks or redness; however, no signs of injury or redness were observed on R1’s face the following day. Additionally, the police report indicated that R1 had no visible injuries and that their dentures were not damaged. Furthermore, record review and interviews revealed that there were no witnesses to the alleged incident. The ED reported conducting an internal investigation, following proper reporting protocols, and taking steps to ensure that R1 continues to feel safe within the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No citations issued at this time. Exit interview conducted. Report was reviewed and a copy provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 3, 2026 inspection of VARENITA OF SIMI VALLEY?

This was an other inspection of VARENITA OF SIMI VALLEY on March 3, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to VARENITA OF SIMI VALLEY on March 3, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.