Complaint·October 24, 2024

Continued from 9099.... Based on LPA’s review of records and interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation that the facility was in disrepair is substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.”) The complaint alleges that R1 attempted to make contact with staff by pulling the emergency cord in their apartment, but it was broken and reported to staff on September 7, 2024. R1 then used their emergency necklace and staff did not respond for over 30 minutes. LPA reviewed call bell records and found that call bell response times for R1 on September 7, 2024 were not answered in a timely manner, taking 20-40 minutes to be answered on three calls. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation that staff did not respond to resident’s call for assistance in a timely manner is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division and Chapter #) are being cited on the attached 9099D. The complaint alleges that staff attempted to administer medication to R1 that was not prescribed by R1’s physician. Staff acknowledged the medication error after R1 refused the medication. Based on interviews conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation that staff mismanaged resident’s medication is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8) are being cited on the attached 9099D.)