Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ATRIA COVELL GARDENSLicense 577000881
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from 9099... In addition, the complaint alleges Facility charged resident for services not rendered. The complaint states R1 was charged for one month, including care costs, although R1 moved out of the facility because the facility could not meet R1’s care needs due to medical condition. LPA reviewed the Admissions Agreement signed by R1 which states that a 30-day notice must be given when a resident chooses to terminate their lease agreement. A 30-day notice was not received by the facility from R1 until May 6, so costs incurred through June 4 would be the responsibility of R1 as specified under the lease agreement. Additionally, the complaint states that R1’s needs could not be met: requiring 24 hour care, and therefore, requiring care at another facility. LPA questioned staff S1 if 24-hour staff was available to meet the needs of R1. S1 stated the facility was not contacted by R1 notifying facility of change in condition or if facility was able to meet R1’s care needs. According to S1 facility does have 24-hour staffing able to meet the needs of R1, so the 30-day notice to terminate the lease agreement was still required. Therefore, the allegation that Facility charged resident for services not rendered is Unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened there is not a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(a)(5)Type B

    87465(a)(5) Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services. The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications when needed.This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on LPA's review of self-reported incident report where resident (R1) self-administered a pill off their floor, but unable to identify which poses a potential health and safety risk to resident in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 9, 2025 inspection of ATRIA COVELL GARDENS?

This was a complaint inspection of ATRIA COVELL GARDENS on July 9, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ATRIA COVELL GARDENS on July 9, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.