Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

CARLTON PLAZA OF DAVISLicense 5770053412 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from 9099.... 6 taking 15 to 44 minutes and three calls taking from 1.56 hours to 3 + hours therefore the allegation is substantiated. (See 809D for the deficiency cited). The complaint alleges Staff do not follow the resident’s care plan. The complainant states some residents’ care plans state they need 2-person assistance due to needing a Hoyer lift, or for incontinence care, and staff have been told to do it on their own. The complainant stated resident R2 is a fall risk, and management said they need to be watched one on one. The complainant stated that it wasn’t communicated to all staff, and R2 fell out of bed 2/13/25. LPA spoke with staff S1 who reported that R2 had enhanced care services 1:1 between 1/22/2025 until 5/13/2025, which were clearly listed in the care plan which is completed by care staff members. The care records for R2 show they had enhanced care services and were receiving additional supports including escorts to and from activities and meals, mealtime support, hourly checks. According to S1, on 2/13/2025 R2 didn't fall but slid out of bed; there were no injuries (the facility utilizes Safely You camera). LPA conducted interviews and found that 6 out of 6 staff stated the company policy for care staff who are providing care independently must ask for assistance from another staff member when providing care for a Hoyer lift or a 2-person assist. Zero of 6 staff stated that they were instructed to initiate care alone for a two person assist. However, 2 of 6 staff members interviewed stated that if they did not receive a timely response to their request for assistance the staff member would aid the resident alone, despite the company policy. Therefore, the allegation that staff do not follow the care plan is substantiated. (See 809D for the deficiency cited). Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Continued on 9099-A Continued from 9099-A Medication list does show barrier cream to be applied once per day but makes no reference to any redness or other concerns. Therefore the allegation that Staff do not ensure that resident is repositioned is unsubstantiated. The complaint alleges Staff do not prevent residents from engaging in inappropriate behavior. The reporting party stated 2 residents (R3 and R4) were found in bed together. Based on interviews LPA found that staff did not anticipate the behavior of residents R3 and R4. During a group activity staff noticed R3 and R4 missing from an activity and when they went to check on them R3 and R4 were found together in bed; an activity within their personal rights. There was no incident report filed citing any abuse or misconduct, and responsible parties were notified. Although it may have been unanticipated residents were exercising their personal rights - not engaging in inappropriate behavior, therefore the allegation that Staff do not prevent residents from engaging in inappropriate behavior is unsubstantiated.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type B

    Facility personnel sufficiency and competence

    87411 Personnel Requirements - General(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to meet resident needs.....for the provision of adequate services. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review,LPA observed Call Light logs from January 20, 20253 through February 19, 2025 in which residents would push the call buttons and the response times were exceeding over 60+ minutes. This is a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to the residents in care.

  • 1569.2(b)Type B

    Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(b):(b) "Care and supervision" means the facility assumes responsibility for, or provides or promises to provide in the future, ongoing assistance with activities of daily living without which the resident’s physical health, mental health, safety, or welfare would be endangered. Assistance includes assistance with taking medications, money management, or personal care. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, staff ignored company policy of using 2-person assist when care plan called for a 2-person assist and worked independently, not waiting for assistance.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 1, 2025 inspection of CARLTON PLAZA OF DAVIS?

This was a complaint inspection of CARLTON PLAZA OF DAVIS on July 1, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to CARLTON PLAZA OF DAVIS on July 1, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "87411 Personnel Requirements - General(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.