Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA Mendez interviewed seven parents of children in care on 11/4/21, 11/15/21, 12/10/21 and 1/19/22. LPA Mendez asked parents (P1-P7) if they witnessed their child or any child in care being spanked by an adult in the home. P1 stated that a child, C1 had witnessed an adult spank a child (C2) because C2 refused to take a nap. P2-P6 stated they never witnessed an adult spank a daycare child. LPA Mendez interviewed seven parents whose children are in care, they were interviewed on 11/4/21, 11/15/21, 12/10/21. LPA Mendez asked parents if their children are forced to take long naps while in care. Two out of the seven parent interviews confirmed the licensee forces their children two nap. Five of seven parents interviewed denied the allegation. LPA Mendez interviewed eight children on 11/4/21 and 11/5/21 two of the eight children were qualified by LPA Mendez to be interviewed. LPA Mendez asked C1 who hit C2, C1 stated another child had hit C2. LPA Mendez asked if an adult spanked C2, C1 then stated that A1 hit C2 on the butt and hurt C2 that C2 was crying. LPA Mendez asked C2 who hit them and C2 was unable to pronounce a name. LPA Mendez asked C2 where were they hit, C2 stated they were hit on their tail in reference to their butt. Of the two children that could be interviewed, C1 stated they liked to take naps at the daycare. C2 did not comment. LPA Mendez interviewed Staff (S1) on 11/5/21 and addressed the allegation of children being forced to nap, S1 stated that children are not forced to nap. S1 stated the children do get tired after lunch. They will close the blinds, put music on and read them books and sing songs until they fall asleep on their own. LPA Mendez asked S1 if they had witnessed S2 spank a child and S1 stated no. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted. The Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 11, 2022 inspection of GALLEGOS, IMELDA FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME?

This was a complaint inspection of GALLEGOS, IMELDA FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME on February 11, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to GALLEGOS, IMELDA FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME on February 11, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.