Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

AUNT SHERRIE'S PRESCHOOL CENTERLicense 0454075902 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 4/2/26 LPA Laird met with owners of the facility Sherrie and Steve Allard. Sherrie and Steve acknowledged the facility roof did have a leak but it had been repaired earlier in the year. Steve stated the leak had caused water damage on an internal wall and there was small amounts of mold but they were in the process of fixing it. Steve denied the facility had exposed electrical wires. Steve stated the wires in the back room are old telephone wires and are not active. Steve denied the air conditioner unit in the toddler room is in disrepair. Steve stated the leakage is condensation from the unit and the color is due to the copper pipes. Steve stated they have had a plumber look at it and confirm it was not hazardous. Steve and Sherrie stated they did not know if all of the advertisements on social media reflected their license number. On 3/23/26 LPA Laird received a copy of an advertisement for the facility which was posted on social media. The advertisement did not reflect the facility number. On 4/2/26 LPA Laird conducted an inspection and toured the facility with director Linda Wright. LPA Laird observed mold in the front preschool classroom in the far right corner. LPA Laird observed stains on the wall leading from the ceiling which appeared to be water damage. LPA Laird inspected the toddler room and observed a split-unit air conditioning unit. The unit had blue stains leading from the left corner of the unit down the wall. LPA Laird touched the wall and did not feel any moisture. LPA Laird observed a box of old telephone wires elevated off of the floor in the back room which is used as a play area. The wires were not connected and were not active. Based on observations, documentation received as part of this investigation, and interviews, LPA Laird determined there is sufficient evidence to suggest the allegations are valid. Based on the evidence obtained, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the facility director, Linda Wright. Appeal rights were provided. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101237(a)Type B

    ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDINGS OR NEW FACILITIES

    101237 Alterations to Existing Buildings or New Facilities (a) Prior to construction or alterations, the licensee shall notify the Department of the proposed change(s).This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observations and licensee statement, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to children in care.

  • 101238(a)Type B

    BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS

    Buildings and Grounds(a) The child care center shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times to ensure the safety and well-being of children, employees and visitors.This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observations, interviews, and documentation received, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to children in care.

  • 1596.861(a)Type B

    (a) Each child day care facility licensed under this chapter, or Chapter 3.5, Chapter 3.6 shall reveal its license number in all advertisements, publications, or announcements made with the intent to attract clients.This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews, and documentation received, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 1, 2026 inspection of AUNT SHERRIE'S PRESCHOOL CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of AUNT SHERRIE'S PRESCHOOL CENTER on May 1, 2026. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to AUNT SHERRIE'S PRESCHOOL CENTER on May 1, 2026?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "101237 Alterations to Existing Buildings or New Facilities (a) Prior to construction or alterations, the licensee shall ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.