Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

CHICO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER MISSION RANCHLicense 0454086213 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 11/07/25 @ 8:40am an unannounced case management inspection was conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Erica Laird. LPA met with Shelly Caperello in response to an Unusual Incident Report received by the Department on 11/04/25. Per the incident report, a child (C1) placed an activity cube on their head and got stuck. Staff removed the cube which caused minor red marks on C1's head. On 11/07/25 LPA Laird conducted an interview with owner Shelly Caperello . Shelly stated she was asked to come into the classroom because C1 had placed an activity cube on their head and it was stuck. Shelly stated she held C1 while S3 helped her to remove the cube. Shelly stated they were about to call the fire dept. but decided to try using oil to remove the cube. Shelly stated with the use of olive oil the cube was able to come off. Shelly stated C1 had a couple of red marks on their head from removing the cube. Shelly stated she immediately called C1's parents and C1 was picked up. Shelly stated C1's parents have disenrolled C1 from care. During today’s inspection, the facility was toured . LPA Laird inspected the infant classroom and infant play yard. LPA Laird observed the play yard to be in the middle of the classroom with direct visibility. LPA Laird observed the play cube did not have an age recommendation on it. LPA Laird took 4 photos, obtained a photo of C1 with marks on their head, documentation of communication and infant sign in sheet from day of incident. LPA Laird conducted interviews with staff (S1-S4). All staff interviewed stated no one observed C1 place the cube on their head. Based on interviews, there were 9 infants and 2 staff present at the time of incident. Based on interviews and observations, the following deficiencies are being cited on the LIC809-D. 101439(I)(4)(b) Infant Care Center Fixtures, Furniture, Equipment and Supplies; 101429(a)(1)Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants; 101416.5(a) Infant Ratio Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with owner Shelly Caperello. Appeal Rights were provided. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • STAFF-INFANT RATIO

    (b) There shall be a ratio of one teacher for every four infants in attendance.This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and documentation received, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to children in care.

  • RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROVIDING CARE AND SUPERVISION FOR INFANTS

    (a) In addition to Section 101229, the following shall apply: (1) Each infant shall be constantly supervised and under direct visual observation and supervision by a staff person at all times. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to children in care.

  • 101439(I)(4)(b)Type B

    (l) Toys shall be safe, and shall not have sharp points or edges or splinters, or be made of small parts that can be pulled off and swallowed. (4) It is recommended that centers comply with the following U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission advice for the selection and safe use of children's toys: (B) Look for labels that give an age recommendation. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 7, 2025 inspection of CHICO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER MISSION RANCH?

This was an other inspection of CHICO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER MISSION RANCH on November 7, 2025. 3 citations were issued: 3 Type B.

Were any citations issued to CHICO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER MISSION RANCH on November 7, 2025?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (0 Type A, 3 Type B). The first citation was for: "(b) There shall be a ratio of one teacher for every four infants in attendance.This requirement was not met as evidence ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.