Complaint·January 8, 2025

Finally, there is not sufficient evidence to pinpoint to any actual incidents, where the marks were sustained and by whom to which may have resulted from infant 1 receiving marks in and around his arm/armpit area(s). Essentially, it cannot be determined if the marks are from picking up infant #1 and to the location where the marks occurred. Although the above allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence at this time to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, no deficiency cited. Exit interview was conducted with Director, Tasha Pesic. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided to Director.