complaint·July 6, 2021

beginning at 1:20pm, Child 4 on 06/30/21 beginning at 05:32pm, Adult 5 on 07/06/21 beginning at 2:30pm, Child 5 on 07/06/21 beginning at 2:35pm, Child 6 on 07/06/21 and beginning at 2:40pm. On multiple occasions, LPA attempted to interview Child 1 and Child 3. Interviews conducted with four staff (Staff 2, 3, 4, & 5) and four parents (Adult 2, 3, 4, and 5) reflects that Staff 1 interacts and communicates with children in a positive manner. LPA attempted to interview Child 1, Child 3, Child 4, Child 5, and Child 6, however, LPA was unable to qualify the children. Interviews conducted with three staff member (Staff 2, Staff 3, Staff 4) and four parents (Adult 2, Adult 3, Adult 4, and Adult 5) reflects that parents and staff have not observed Staff 1 discuss inappropriate content in front of children or discuss confidential information in front of others. LPA attempted to interview Child 1, Child 3, Child 4, Child 5, and Child 6; however, LPA was unable to qualify the children. Interviews with parents, staff, and the facility management did not provide corroborating evidence to meet the preponderance of evidence threshold standard and therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Program Supervisor signature is not on file, however, a copy of this Complaint Investigation Report (LIC 9099) was provided to Program Supervisor; and confirmation of receipt is on file. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited during today\342\200\231s tele-investigation. Appeal Rights were provided.