complaint·May 22, 2025

Interviews conducted by Adults (A3 & A4) stated to have no current concerns with the allegation filed against the facility. However, from one adult interview (A1) indicated there was a personal reason that may have kept LS from being present and providing care at the facility, however no corroborating evidence was revealed. In addition, upon LPA\342\200\231s inspections on 03/12/2025, 04/09/2025 & 05/06/2025, LS was observed at the facility and proving care to daycare children. It was also indicated by individuals residing at the home that they would often assist at the facility with LS being present. Based on the information gathered during this investigation, although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred and therefore are determined to be unsubstantiated. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited. This report was reviewed and discussed with Licensee, Rachael Stultz (LS). Appeal rights were provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days from today's visit.