Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

L.A.VALLEY COLLEGE CAMPUS CHILD DEVE.CTR.License 1912301462 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 08/27/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Suzette Ornelas conducted an unannounced Case Management \342\200\223 Incident inspection related to a self-reported Unusual Incident Report (UIR) submitted on 08/21/2025. Upon arrival, LPA met with Director, JENNIFER GUEVARA , and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA observed 0 children in care due to school currently not being in session. According to the UIR, on 07/31/2025, 4 out of 6 staff observed S2 to be acting differently than normal when returning to the classroom (where children were present) from their lunch break. Staff described S2's behavior as happier than usual, giggling, speaking loudly, unable to understand what they were saying, asking children math questions and giving them the wrong answers. 2 of the 6 staff stated that they smelled alcohol on S2's breath. S6 removed S2 from the classroom immediately upon suspicion and did not return to the classroom that day. On 8/26/2025, the UIR (LIC624) was submitted in writing to the department via email. During today\342\200\231s inspection, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documents. Per Director, she was not present the day the incident took place.LPA obtained copies of statements written by staff who were present to observe the incident. LPA obtained a copy of a Criminal Record Exemption Needed for S2 that the facility obtained on 8/27/2025. As of today LPA confirmed that, S2 is Eligible/Cleared on Guardian. Due to the Unusual Incident not being reported to the El Segundo Regional Office by telephone or fax within the Department's next working day and during its normal business hours and in writing within 7 days, 1 Type B deficiency is being cited in accordance to Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations for Reporting Requirements (101212). Please refer to 809-D for cited deficiencies. 1 Type B deficiency is being cited in relation to facility not reporting the incident in the timely manner required in accordance to Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations: Reporting Requirements (101212). Please refer to 809-D for cited deficiencies. 1 Type A deficiency is being cited in relation to S2's behavior in accordance to Health and Safety Code Chapter 03.4 California Child Day Care Act Article 04 : 1596.885 Denial, suspension or revocation of license, registration, or special permits; grounds . Please refer to 809-D for cited deficiencies. Licensee was advised upon receive of this report, the report must be posted along with the notice of site visit for 30 days for parents to view. Licensee must inform the parents/guardians of children in care at the facility and to parents/guardians of children newly enrolled at the facility during the next 12 months via form LIC 9224 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Licensing Reports. If the Licensee fails to comply $100.00 civil penalty shall be assessed for each family enrolled and in attendance. Exit interview conducted with the licensee and a copy of this report was provided along with the appeal rights. At this time, no further investigation is needed. An exit interview was conducted with Director, JENNIFER GUEVARA, A copy of this report and Notice of Site Visit were provided and must remain posted for 30 days.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101212(d)Type B

    REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

  • HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION

    1596.885 Denial, suspension or revocation of license, registration, or special permits; grounds (c) Conduct which is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of either an individual in or receiving services from the facility or the people of this state. This requiremnt is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and documentation, S2 did not comply with the section cited above in being under the influence in the classroom while children were present, which poses/posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 27, 2025 inspection of L.A.VALLEY COLLEGE CAMPUS CHILD DEVE.CTR.?

This was a other inspection of L.A.VALLEY COLLEGE CAMPUS CHILD DEVE.CTR. on August 27, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to L.A.VALLEY COLLEGE CAMPUS CHILD DEVE.CTR. on August 27, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B).

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.