Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

MARYVALE DAY CARE CENTERLicense 191500469
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Veronica Martinez Garza conducted an unannounced Case Management Incident inspection at the above facility on 03/04/26 at 01:45 p.m. The purpose of this inspection is to follow up on an incident that was reported to the Department within 24 hours. At 02:05 p.m., LPA met with the facility representative who guided LPA on a tour of the facility and census was taken. According to the facility representative there are 76 preschoolers enrolled. On 02/10/26 at approximately 11:00am, child 1 (C1) was in the preschool playground and was observed jumping off a bench that is near a cement wall that contains dirt and grass. The lower cement wall is at the level of the child sized benches. C1 was reminded not to be jumping off the bench and while the teacher briefly turned to speak to another child when the teacher turned back, they observed C1 was already in the process of jumping off the bench. The teacher observed C1 fall and hit his forehead on the edge of the cement wall. LPA conducted an interview with S1 who stated that they were providing care and supervision near the area where the incident occurred. According to S1, they had vision of the entire yard and remembered seeing C1 playing in the bench area. Per S1, C1, was reminded not to be jumping off and then observed C1 jump off once again but turned around to assist another child. S1 recalled turning back to see C1 and observed that the child was sitting on the floor. S1 couldn’t determine if the child fell but when they focused on the child they observed blood on the child’s head. S1 immediately went towards C1 to assist and provide first aid. Per S1, there was another teacher who was also supervising children near the block area who observed what occurred and approached C1. Page 1 of 3 S1 grabbed towels and took them over to apply pressure to C1s cut since he was bleeding. Staff who were present in the playground called administration for assistance and to bring the first aid kit. According to S1, administration responded immediately and brought gloves, towels, and the first aid kit. LPA interviewed S2 who stated that C1 is very active and loves to run and jump. According to S2, C1 was observed jumping off the bench and was reminded by S3 to not be jumping off the bench. S2 turned their back and when they turned back to supervise the area where C1 was they observed C1 landing on the cement and sitting after the jump. S2 immediately went over to C1 and observed blood was coming from his head. S2 also corroborated that administration was called immediately for assistance and support. Per S2, administration brought gloves, towels, and a first aid kit. Interview conducted with S3 revealed that they were near the area where C1 was playing. According to S3, C1 was playing in the bench area and told the child to not jump off the bench. When S3 was about to continue supervising the playground they saw S2 run towards C1 and observed that the child was bleeding. Per S3, they radioed for administration to come and assist the staff. S3 stated that administration came with gloves, towels, and a first aid kit. Interviews conducted with S4 revealed that they were leaving the playground when a staff member called out their name. As S4 was approaching the area of the incident they observed C1 was bleeding and radioed S5. Per S4, they radioed that there was a head injury and S5 provided the first aid kit, gloves, and towels. Staff interviewed revealed that S1 and S2 responded immediately to assist and assess C1. Staff also corroborated that towels were placed in C1s head to apply pressure and stop the bleeding. Interviews corroborate that staff were supporting the child and other staff while ensuring that the child was doing well and calm. Staff revealed that C1 was taken to the restroom, the area was cleaned, changed clothing, applied an ice pack and a band aid was placed over the cut. C1 was then taken to the office which by then parent of C1 was already notified. Parent arrived at the facility and assessed the child. Parent later notified the facility that the child was taken to the doctor. According to the parent, the doctor stated that the child did not need stitches and provided a doctor’s note without restrictions. Staff stated that the child is still enrolled/attending the facility and after the incident the child return to the facility the next day. During the inspection LPA toured the area where the incident took place. LPA observed that the benches are age appropriate and in good condition. LPA did not observe any hazards that pose a risk to children in care. Staff interviewed revealed that there has not been other incidents in the area. Though staff were actively supervising children the incident occurred so fast. Page 2 of 3 During this inspection, LPA interviewed Staff 1 (S1 thru 5). LPA reviewed staff statements and the accident report for C1. LPA also obtained copies of staff statements, accident report and doctor’s note. At this time, the licensee is in compliance with California Title 22 Regulations. Therefore, there are no citations being issued today. The Notice of Site Visit (LIC 9213) must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative, a civil penalty of $100 can be assessed. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility representative Victoria Casas. Page 3 of 3

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 4, 2026 inspection of MARYVALE DAY CARE CENTER?

This was a other inspection of MARYVALE DAY CARE CENTER on March 4, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MARYVALE DAY CARE CENTER on March 4, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.