Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

FLANNER HEAD START PRESCHOOLLicense 1915706862 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On April 18, 2024, at 8:45 am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carolyn Tuba conducted a case management inspection due to an incident that occurred at the facility on 3/6/2024. LPA met with Program Manager, Lucy Barcelo who guided the LPA on a tour to obtain the census of 26 children with 7 staff. LPA conducted interviews with Program Manager, Lucy Barcelo, Education Supervisor, Yolanda Orozco and Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) who witnessed or were involved in the incident. Child Development Program Director, Rosing Ducoing was not available, who reported the incident to the Department. It was not necessary to interview Child #1. The incident was not reported to the Department within the required 24 hours of occurrence. The incident occurred on 3/6/2024 but was not reported to the Department until 3/18/2024. LPA advised if the facility is unsure about reporting certain incidents, they should call the On-Duty Analyst of the Day to clarify what is reportable and what is not reportable. LPA reminded the Education Supervisor and Program Manager that they should notify by calling or emailing to the Department using the electronic email address of MPROincidentreports@dss.ca.gov within the first 24 hours. The incident that occurred on 3/6/2024 at approximately 11:30-11:45 am, was due to Child #1 was outside of the classroom with S2 due to behavior concerns and for the safety of children in care. C1 and S2 were in a gated walkway for parents and children to enter the classroom. It has two gates located on each end and is surrounded by a chain link fence. Each gate has a lock and door handle. According to S2, she took C1 to the enclosed walkway. One gate is known as the entrance gate and the other is known as the exit gate. S2 was with C1 and never lost visual however C1 ran to the entrance gate and S2 blocked C1 from getting out. Then C1 ran to the exit gate and climbed the chain link gate and unlock the door, turned the doorknob and opened the exit gate. S2 was able to catch C1 by the gate however C1 wiggled free and proceeded Page 1 of 2 towards the parking lot and got approximately 46 feet away from the exit gate. S2 proceeded to guide C1 back into the facility. C1 was unharmed. S2 notified S1 who called parents of C1 and informed them of the incident. Education Supervisor and Child Development Program Director conducted their own investigation. Strategies have been put in place. LPA took photos and measurements during today\342\200\231s visit. The deficiency listed on the following page were observed by the LPA and is being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 22. Please see attached LIC 809-D. The deficiency that is being cited needs to be cleared to protect the children\342\200\231s health & safety. Notice of site visit was given to the licensee and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Program Manager, Lucy Barcelo. Page 2 of 2

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101212(d)(1)Type B

    Upon the occurrence, during the operation of the child care center of any of the events specified in (d) (1) below, a report shall be made to the Department by telephone or fax within the Department's next working day and during its normal business hours..... This requirement was not met as evidence to record review of Incident Report and Unusual Incident Report (UIR) was dated that incident occured on 3/6/2024 and notification to the Department was on 3/18/2024 which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment to meet his/her needs. This requirement was not met as evidence due to interviews with staff regarding an incident of a child gaining access to the parking lot on 3/6/2024, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risks to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 18, 2024 inspection of FLANNER HEAD START PRESCHOOL?

This was a other inspection of FLANNER HEAD START PRESCHOOL on April 18, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to FLANNER HEAD START PRESCHOOL on April 18, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "Upon the occurrence, during the operation of the child care center of any of the events specified in (d) (1) below, a re..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.