Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

At 11:30 am Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Roxana Lopez and Priscilla Ochoa conducted an unannounced case management- incident inspection to the above facility. The purpose of this inspection was to follow-up on an incident that was self- reported to the department on 05/10/2024 LPAs met with Principal of Preschool Programs , Glenda Hiron, who gave LPAs a tour of the facility. On 05/10/2024 an incident was self reported to the department within the required 24 hours. Per Incident reported On 5/09/2024 Child # 1 was pulled down from a small step-2 slide by child # 2, child # 1 fell backwards hitting the back of their head. LPA conducted interviews with staff, incident was observed and first aid was provided. Parents were called to pick up child and were encouraged to take child to the doctor. Doctor's note was provided with no restrictions. For this inspection, the licensee is in compliance with California Code of Regulations Title 22. No deficiencies cited. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the facility representative Samara Baker. ------------------------------------------------------ pg. 1 of 1 -----------------------------------------------------------

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101230(c)(1)Type A

    (c) A teacher-child ratio of one teacher supervising 24 napping children is permitted... (1) An aide who is 18 years of age or older... may supervise 24 napping children in place of a teacher if the conditions specified in (c) above are met. This requirement was not met as evidenced by Based on observations the licensee did not comply on section cited above in that Room # 2 with 14 children and 1 aide, 2 children were awake, 1 sitting up on their cot. Room # 3 with 15 children and 1 aide, 3 children were awake- 1 walking around and 1 yelling. This is an immediate risk for the children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 16, 2024 inspection of MOUNTAIN VIEW CHILDREN CENTER?

This was a other inspection of MOUNTAIN VIEW CHILDREN CENTER on August 16, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MOUNTAIN VIEW CHILDREN CENTER on August 16, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.