Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

LINDBERGH FULL DAYLicense 191570895
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analysts(LPAs) Jeanette Estrada and Keneisha Dunlap conducted a case management- incident inspection at the facility. LPAs met with Education Specialist, Gisele Ochoa and explained the reason for the visit. There were 15 children and four staff in classroom 1 and 23 children with # staff in classroom 2. The facility submitted an Unusual Incident Report (UIR) to the Department on 11/01/2024. The UIR described an incident which occurred on 10/31/24 in which three children ran into a gated electrical panel area during outside time. Per the UIR, the children were noticed to be running around the gated electrical panel area by staff 1. Staff 1 alerted Staff 2 who attempted to stop the children when the children made their way into the gated area. Per the UIR, the gate was slightly open at the time which allowed the children to go inside. During today's visit, LPAs conducted staff interviews, made observations and took photos of the gated electrical panel area. LPAs observed that the gate has been secured and there is no access to the locked gate. At this time, further investigation will be conducted by CCLD. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted with Facility Representatives. A copy of this report and a Notice of Site Visit were provided. Facility Representatives were advised Notice of Site Visit must remain posted for 30 days.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • CRIMINAL RECORD CLEARANCE

    102370(d)(1)Criminal Record Clearance:All individuals subject to a criminal record review...shall prior to working... in a licensed facility:Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based observation and record review LPAs observed Staff 1 providing care and LPAs reviewed Guardian where it was revealed Staff 1did not have a criminal record clearance through the Department.This poses an immediate safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 14, 2024 inspection of LINDBERGH FULL DAY?

This was a other inspection of LINDBERGH FULL DAY on November 14, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to LINDBERGH FULL DAY on November 14, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.