Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CHILDTIME CHILDREN'S CENTERLicense 191597334
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

One report out of the four did not have a specific explanation on how Child#1 sustained an injury which caused a mark on their cheek. The details of this particular incident report stated that there was a red mark observed on Child#1's face. During interviews conducted with Staff members, LPA Lee was not able to obtain any additional information regarding this specific incident report. While it is possible that Child#1 sustained an injury due to a lack of supervision, one incident report that stated a mark was observed on the child's face is not a clear indication that a child sustained an injury. It is possible that the mark was came from an interaction with another child, the child scratching or touching their own face, or the child falling or bumping into something. The fact that 3 out of the 4 incidents provide an explanation on how Child#1 sustained their injuries does indicate the facility providing some level of supervision. It is possible that a child in care sustained an injury at a facility despite having proper teacher to child ratio in the classroom and adequate supervision was being provided For example, if a child were to sustain an injury due to another child biting them, a staff member could have witnessed this entire interaction but was not able to physically prevent the interaction due to not being close enough to the two children. Based on the evidence collected during the investigation, the allegation that facility s taff does not ensure supervision is provided to children in care resulting in child sustaining injuries at the facility may be valid. However, there is not enough preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore at this time the allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. The notice of site inspection must remain posted for a period of 30 days during hours of operation. Failure to maintain posting will result in a civil penalty of $100.00 dollars. Exit interview conducted with Director Pam Deem. Appeal rights discussed and explained.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 1, 2024 inspection of CHILDTIME CHILDREN'S CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of CHILDTIME CHILDREN'S CENTER on November 1, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CHILDTIME CHILDREN'S CENTER on November 1, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.