complaint·July 31, 2025

The information provided by the Reporting Party indicates that the provider speaks inappropriately to day care children. During interviews with staff, parents, and children, disclosures were made that Adult #1, is the owner of the family childcare and is present at the childcare facility. Based on interviews conducted with staff and children, disclosures were made that although Adult #1 is not the official owner/licensee of the facility, however, they do provide care at the facility and assist with the maintenance and the purchase of meals and snacks for children in care. In addition, disclosures were made that there have been times when Adult #1 speaks in an aggressive tone and in an angry manner. LPA confirmed that Adult #1 is associated to the facility. Based on LPA\342\200\231s investigation, documents obtained, and statements obtained from staff, parents, and children, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 Chapter 1, 102423(a)(4) Personal Rights is being cited on the attached deficiencies page. As a result of today\342\200\231s visit, a Type B Deficiency was issued for regulation 102423(a)(4) Personal Rights and a Plan of Correction is due 09/01/2025. The Notice of Site Visit (LIC 9213) must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. Exit interview was conducted with Valerio Quiros, Assistant including, but not limited to Provider Rights, Appeal Procedures and Agencies Consultative Role.