Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 12/23/2024, LPA Ranita Richmond and Brittany Lovest conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted by administrator Kasa Adame. LPA toured the facility inside and outside for Health & Safety inspection. LPA observed 16 children being supervised and cared for by 3 fingerprint cleared staff. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, there is no evidence to show that personal rights or reporting requirements were violated. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur. Per Title 22 Regulations and Health and Safety Codes, no citations were issued. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report was read and provided to admin Kasa Adame. Notice of Site Visit was provided and required to be posted for 30 days.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

    101212 Reporting Requirements(d)...the child care center..., a report shall be made to the Department by telephone or fax within the Department's next working day... In addition, a written report containing the information..be submitted..(1) Events ...(D) Any suspected.. abuse of any child Based on records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Licensee did not report to the Department, which poses animmediate Health, Safety and, Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

  • 101230(c)Type B

    ACTIVITIES/NAPPING

    101230 Activities(c) A teacher-child ratio of one teacher supervising 24 napping children is permitted provided that the remaining teachers necessary to meet the overall ratio specified in Section 101216.3(a) are immediately available at the center. Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with thesection cited above. Teacher -child ratio of one teacher supervising 24 napping children was not met, which poses animmediate Health, Safety and, Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 23, 2024 inspection of LOOK WHO'S LEARNING PRE-SCHOOL?

This was a complaint inspection of LOOK WHO'S LEARNING PRE-SCHOOL on December 23, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to LOOK WHO'S LEARNING PRE-SCHOOL on December 23, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.