Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

TUTOR TIME LEARNING CENTERLicense 1974112112 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

P1 disclosed that on 06/27/23 at 3:30 PM, Adult 1 (A1) picked up C1 from the center and Staff 1 (S1) did not disclose that C1 was bitten by another child. At 3:45 PM, A1 noticed the bite mark on C1 and P1 called the facility and spoke with Staff 2 (S2). S2 notified P1 that C1 was bitten earlier in the day and they had an incident report. S1 disclosed that on 06/27/23 at 11:30 AM, C1 was bitten by Child 2 (C2) while S1 was doing diaper changes. S1 had placed C2 in the restroom to be able to provide supervision to C2. S1 let C2 out of the restroom because C2 was grabbing the toilets and as soon as S1 let C2 out of the restroom, C2 bit C1. S1 observed the incident, but was not near the children and could not stop C2 from biting C1. S1 was supposed to make a written report immediately and forgot because S1 was the only staff in the room and there were “so many things happening.” During pick up, S1 did not tell A1 that C1 was bitten. S1 disclosed C2 had bitten another child two weeks prior and S1 notified the director that S1 needed help because there were too many children and C2 move really fast. LPA Almanza received photographs of the bite mark to C1’s left forearm. LPA can clearly see the imprint of another child’s teeth on C1’s left forearm. C2 was enrolled into the Center on 03/25/22, is 4 years and 8 months old. C1 is 2 years and 2 months old. S1 is the teacher of the 2 year-old classroom. LPA received four Incident Reports of C2 biting other children and one Incident Report for C2 scratching another child’s face. LPA did not receive an incident report for C2 biting another child two weeks prior to the allegation being reported. C2 is in a classroom with children smaller than C2. This agency has investigated the allegations that “Facility staff are not providing adequate supervision to day-care children resulting in a child being bit by another child in care” and “Facility did not report an incident to a parent being bitten." Based on LPA’s interviews and records review which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, Article 06, Section 101229 Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision and 101212 Reporting Requirements, are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the facility representative Cheryl Gartsman.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101212(f)Type B

    REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

    The items specified in (d)(1)(A) through (H) above shall also be reported to the child's authorized representative.This Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, on 06/27/23, Adult 1 was not informed at pick up of C1 being bitten, which poses a potential Health or Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

  • 101229(a)Type B

    RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROVIDING CARE AND SUPERVISION

    The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the children's needs.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews conducted, on 06/27/23, S1 was not able to provide the necessary supervision to keep C2 from biting C1, due to changing diapers, which poses a potential Health or Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

  • 101161(a)Type B

    LIMITATIONS ON CAPACITY

    Limitations on Capacity, A licensee shall not operate a child care center beyond the conditions and limitations specified on the license, including the capacity limitation.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, the preschool was providing service to C1 who is over 4.9 years of age, which poses a potential Health or Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    101223(a)(3) Personal Rights, To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation...including but not limited to: interference with functions of daily living...aids to physical functioning.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on documentation obtained and interviews conducted, on 01/04/23, S1 restrained C1; and on 01/17/23, S2 scratched C1 under the right arm, which poses a potential Health or Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 3, 2023 inspection of TUTOR TIME LEARNING CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of TUTOR TIME LEARNING CENTER on August 3, 2023. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to TUTOR TIME LEARNING CENTER on August 3, 2023?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "The items specified in (d)(1)(A) through (H) above shall also be reported to the child's authorized representative.This ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.