Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

BETHLEHEM LUTHERAN SCHOOLLicense 197418346
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During today\342\200\231s inspection, LPA and LPM observed staff wearing facial coverings. Based on observations, interviews conducted, and record review, the allegation of staff not wearing facial coverings is rendered unsubstantiated. There is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the above allegation. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report, and notice of site visit was provided to the licensee along with appeal rights.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101223(a)(2)Type B

    PERSONAL RIGHTS

    Personal Rights: The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: to be accorded safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations, furnishings, and equipment to meet his/her needs. This requirement was not met as evidence by on 10/20/21, LPAs observed that 18 children were not wearing facial coverings while indoors. During interviews conducted children disclosed they do not wear facial coverings. This is a type B deficiency which poses a potential Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to children in care.

  • 101229.1(a)(1)Type B

    SIGN IN AND SIGN OUT

    Sign In and Sign Out: In addition to the sign-in procedure requirement of Section 101226.1(b), the licensee shall develop, maintain, and implement a written procedure to sign the child in/out of the child care center that shall, at a minimum, include the following: This requirement was not met as evidence by parents are not consistently signing in and signing out their children. This is a type B deficiency which poses a potential Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 28, 2021 inspection of BETHLEHEM LUTHERAN SCHOOL?

This was a complaint inspection of BETHLEHEM LUTHERAN SCHOOL on December 28, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to BETHLEHEM LUTHERAN SCHOOL on December 28, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.