Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

IMMANUEL DREW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONLicense 1974184701 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 05/21/24, LPAs observed the facility to be unkempt. The following was observed and photo’s where taken: - Trash cans in the play yards and in classrooms where full and open - Trash and debris on the playgrounds - Broken toys and trash in the parking lots. W#1, #2, #3 stated that the facility is not clean. A representative from Drew Corporation stated that the corporation is aware that the facility is in need of repairs and cleaning still needs to be done. Per representative, the corporation became aware in late March 2024 and has been working to maintain facility. Per representative, corporate did not know the conditions of the facility until previous director left and a random inspection occurred by corporate. Based on LPA interviews and observations, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 12, Chapter number 1) are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted and report was reviewed with the Director. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a $100.00 civil penalty. Appeal rights were discussed and provided to Site Supervisor, Ortiz. Based on the information obtained, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that personal rights were violated. The allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Appeal rights were provided and discussed with the facility representative. A Notice of Site Visit (LIC 9213) was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview was conducted and report was reviewed with Site Supervisor Ortiz.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101238(a)Type B

    BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS

    Buildings and Grounds. The child care center shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. This requirement is not met as evidence by LPAs observations and interviews conducted with staff and parents. On 05/21/24, LPAs observed and photographed, broken toys, door, and a a bent gate. Staff and parents interviewed stated that the gate between the preschool yard and toddler yard was also broken.This poses a potential risk to the health and safety of the children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 10, 2024 inspection of IMMANUEL DREW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION?

This was a complaint inspection of IMMANUEL DREW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION on July 10, 2024. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to IMMANUEL DREW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION on July 10, 2024?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Buildings and Grounds. The child care center shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. This requi..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.