Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) T. Tran and A. Carter arrived at the above licensed facility to deliver final finding for the above complaint allegations. Upon arrival, LPAs met with Site Supervisor, Douglas Franco and toured the facility. LPAs observed proper care and supervision. Based upon the evidence obtained during the course of the investigation through interviews, record reviews, and observation, the evidence does not support, nor disprove the above allegations of staff mishandled children in care and staff spoke to children in an inappropriate manner occurred at the facility. Staff indicated when working with challenging behavior children they use positive reinforcement to support the children’s growth such as, redirection, create a safe space, distracting children with learning materials to gain children’s attention. Therefore, the allegations have been determined unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated – A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the facility representative, Douglas Franco.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101212(b)Type B

    REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

    The name of the child care center director, and any fully qualified teacher(s) designated to act in the child care center director's absence, shall be reported to the Department within 10 days of a change of child care center director or designee(s). This requirement is not met as evidenced bybased on record review and interview conducted facility failed to report new hired director which poses a potential health and safety risk to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 3, 2024 inspection of IMMANUEL DREW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION?

This was a complaint inspection of IMMANUEL DREW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION on October 3, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to IMMANUEL DREW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION on October 3, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.