Complaint·November 10, 2025

-Pertaining to the allegation that, "Staff did not provide child's responsible party copy of recent Type "A" citation report" -Per the Reporting Party (RP), "never received notice of Substantiated Type A report dated 8/13/24." Pertaining to the above allegation, while conducting children's record review on 9/19/2025, LPA did not observe the Acknowledgement of Receipt of Licensing Report (LIC9224). While conducting an interview with Licensee Abergel on 11/10/2025, Licensee was unaware that copy of the Type "A" citation must be kept in a child file for a year, as well as any newly admitted child. LPA Morales provided a copy of the LIC 9224 to Licensee. -Pertaining to the allegation that , "Children's records are Incomplete." -Per the Reporting Party (RP), "there is incomplete record keeping, licensee did not ask for vaccination." Pertaining to the above allegation, while conducting children's record review, LPA reviewed 7 children's files. Upon reviewing files, children's immunization's were on file. However, 5 out of the 7 children's record reviewed did not have the LIC627 Incidental medical services on file. LPA Morales did not see the LIC 9150 Parent Notification on file. LPA Morales provided a copy of missing forms as well as went over documents with Licensee. Based upon observation the above allegation has been determine to be Substantiated. A finding of Substantiated means that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division & Chapter number) are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Notice of Site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Licensee Anies Abergel. -Pertaining to the allegation that, " Staff do not have Criminal Background Clearance." -Per the Reporting Party (RP), observed an "unidentified male coming from upstairs of the back house." On 9/19/2025, LPA Morales did not observe a male at the time of the visit. All adults in the home were cleared. On 11/10/2025, LPA did not observe a male on the premise. When asked if their is a separate address on the premise, Licensee stated "yes." Licensee informed LPA that the back house is not there's. Therefore, based upon observations and interviews conducted the allegations above have been determined to be Unsubstantiated. The allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Notice of Site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed Mariam Boyajyan.