Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

LITTLE TREEHOUSE ACADEMYLicense 197419435
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During the interview with the Director, the Director denied having knowledge about staff hitting a daycare child, staff causing injury to daycare children or staff forcing daycare child to nap. During the interview with the Assistant Director, The Assistant Director denied having knowledge of the above allegations as well. While interviewing staff, staff made no disclosures regarding the allegations. Parents interviewed did not present concerns related to the above-mentioned allegations and were pleased with the services and care being provided to their children. LPA made attempts to interview children but was unsuccessful. Based on the investigation conducted, there is insufficient evidence to support the above-mentioned allegations to be true. Therefore, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. The Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. Exit interview was conducted with Director / Anna Shirokova and Appeals Rights provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    Personal Rights. The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation, ridicule, coercion, threat, mental abuse or other actions of a punitive nature including but not limited to: interference with functions of daily living including eating, sleeping or toileting; or withholding of shelter, clothing, medication or aids to physical functioning. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: The Assistant Director disclosed that Staff 2 made a disclosure of Staff 1 mishandling a Child in a rough manner. It was also disclosed that Staff 1 was removed from their position temporarily and placed in the office and assigned office related work. Counseling was provided to Staff 1 regarding handling children in a rough manner. During the interview with Staff 3, it was disclosed that Staff 3 has observed Staff 1 on multiple occasions handling children in a rough manner. This poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights to children in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 22, 2024 inspection of LITTLE TREEHOUSE ACADEMY?

This was a complaint inspection of LITTLE TREEHOUSE ACADEMY on February 22, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to LITTLE TREEHOUSE ACADEMY on February 22, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.