complaint·October 10, 2025

Upon arrival, LPA observed one staff member (S1) caring for three infants. When asked if the staff present was qualified, the Director confirmed that S1 was not. The Director explained that S1 typically assists a qualified teacher and is not usually left alone with the infants. Per Director she had to step out and asked S1 to assist temporarily. The Director reported that she is present in the infant room from 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM, at which time the first qualified staff member (S2) arrives. S2 works from 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM, S3 works from 1:00 PM to 5:30 PM, and S1 works from 8:00 AM to 12:30 PM. The Director also stated that the last infant leaves at 5:00 PM. LPA informed the Director that infants must not be left in the care with unqualified staff or volunteers under any circumstances. At approximately 9:20 AM, LPA observed staff member S2 in the infant room with the children. Upon reviewing S2’s personnel file, LPA confirmed that S2 is fully qualified to care for infants . Based on the LPA observations and interview with Director, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (code) is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Licensee/Director Sunethra Ipalawatte. Appeals Rights and the Notice of Site visit were provided. The Notice of Site Visit must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. Page 2.