Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The Department conducted a full investigation, which included staff interviews, interviews with relevant parties and other agencies, as well as a record review which included documentation related to the allegation. LPA did not observe, nor was information provided via interviews that provided sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in daycare child sustaining injuries. Classroom Observations were conducted, and LPA did not observed that staff did not provide adequate supervision. During the visit children were observed during choice time and restroom time. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. Meaning, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, copy of this report was read, appeal rights along with Notice of Site Visit were provided. Notice of Site Visit is required to be posted for 30 days.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

    (d) Upon the occurrence, during the operation of the child care center of any of the events specified in (d)(1) below, a report shall be made to the Department by telephone or fax within the Department's next working day and during its normal business hours.In addition, a written report containingthe information a written report containing the information specified in (d)(2) below shall be submitted...(D)Events reported shall..(B) Any unusual incident.....This requirement was not met by evidence by: facility failed to report an unusual incident

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights:To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation,ridicule, coercion, threat, mental abuse or other actions of a punitive nature including but not........ This requirement was not met by evidence by:Staff members were witnessed grabbing or pulling on a child to prevented child from running in the classroom, and teachers have grabbed a child with force.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 2, 2025 inspection of COALICION DE LATINOS AMERICANOS, INC.?

This was a complaint inspection of COALICION DE LATINOS AMERICANOS, INC. on July 2, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to COALICION DE LATINOS AMERICANOS, INC. on July 2, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.