Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

TINY THINKERS PRESCHOOLLicense 1974934842 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lilia Hernandez conducted an unannounced case management inspection due to a self-reported incident that occurred at the facility. LPA arrived at the facility at 1:35PM and met with Marisol Nepomuceno, Director, who guided LPA on a tour of the facility. There were 65 children in care and 9 staff present upon arrival. On 02/07/2025, LPA followed up on an incident that was reported to the Department on 02/05/2025, via telephone. It was later disclosed by the facility that the incident occurred on 01/31/2025 and were unsure if injury was reportable. Information reported to the Department indicated that Parent of Child #1 reported to the facility that Child#1 may have sustained an injury while in care. LPA conducted interviews with Director, Staff #1 through Staff #5 and Parent #1. LPA obtained written statements from staff for this incident. LPA also obtained a copy of the facility roster and reviewed records. LPA was able to contact Parent'#2 who provided updates to Child #1's condition. During the interviews with staff, staff were not able to provided enough information as to how Child #1 sustained an injury. Staff disclosed that Child #1 was newly enrolled to the facility. Staff also disclosed that during drop off, Child #1 was crying. Staff were not able to verify if Child #1 was crying from an injury or if Child #1 was crying due to separation from parent during drop off. Both Parent #2 and staff disclosed that a thorough daily inspection of Child#1 was not conducted at the time the facility accepted Child #1 at drop off to the facility.. Based upon information received from the interviews conducted it was determined that there was a lapse in care and supervision, the facility failed to conduct a daily inspection of Child #1 when dropped off at the facility in which the facility was unable to determine of Child #1 sustained in injury while in care or prior to arriving to the facility. ---Page 1 of 2 The following deficiencies listed on the attached LIC809D are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 22. The Notice of Site Visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. Exit interview was conducted and report was reviewed with Marisol Nepomuceno, Director. ---Page 2 of 2

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101226.1(a)Type B

    Daily Inspection for Illness (a) The licensee shall be responsible for ensuring that children with obvious symptoms of illness including, but not limited to, fever or vomiting, are not accepted...This requirement was not met evidenced by: Based on interviews and disclosures made, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a daily inspection of Child #1 when dropped off at the facility in which the facility was unable to determine of Child #1 sustained in injury while in care or prior to arriving to the facility which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROVIDING CARE AND SUPERVISION

    Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision (a) The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the children's needs...Supervision shall include visual observation.This requirement was not met evidenced by: Based on interviews and disclosures made, it was determined there was a lapse in care and supervision in which the facility was unable to determine of Child #1 sustained in injury while in care or prior to arriving to the facility which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 26, 2025 inspection of TINY THINKERS PRESCHOOL?

This was a other inspection of TINY THINKERS PRESCHOOL on February 26, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to TINY THINKERS PRESCHOOL on February 26, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "Daily Inspection for Illness (a) The licensee shall be responsible for ensuring that children with obvious symptoms of i..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.