Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

ASATRYAN AND OUZOUNIAN FAMILY CHILD CARELicense 1974948356 citations on this visit
6 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Zaragoza and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Rita Ramos conducted an unannounced case management deficiencies inspection on 01/23/26. LPA and LPM arrived at the facility at 9:30AM and met with licensees,Ofelya Asatryan and Paul Ouzounian who granted entrance and guided LPA and LPM on a tour of the facility. There were 2 children with 0 staff upon arrival. The purpose of the visit is to address other deficiencies that were discovered during the course of an investigation for Complaint # 58-CC-20250916143349. The department\342\200\231s Investigations Branch (IB) I nvestigator, Laura Garcia, and LPA Elicia Calvillo discovered that on 07/29/25 there was an incident in which Licensee, Ofelya Asatryan and Co-Licensee, Paul Harout had 18 children in care. The facility is licensed for a capacity of 14 and exceeded their capacity by having 4 additional children present on this date. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to children in care. Based on the information provided by the IB investigator, all 18 children in care on 07/29/25 were between the age of 1 year through 6 years of age which puts the facility out of ratio. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to children in care. Due to Licensee and Co-Licensee having 18 children in care on 07/29/25, they exceeded the capacity of 14 which is in violation of their fire clearance. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to children in care. A civil penalty of $500 is being assessed. (Continue to Page 2...) (Page 2 Continued...) Interviews were conducted by IB Investigator in which Licensee, Ofelya Asatryan and Co-Licensee, Paul Harout, were concerned about Adult #1\342\200\231s aggressive behavior since May of 2025. A petition for a restraining order against Adult #1 was filed on 07/07/2025. Licensee and Co-Licensee did not report the concern or the filing of the petition to the department. Per Ofelya Asatryan, on 07/15/25 Adult #1 was served with paperwork for a hearing date of 07/29/25. Licensee and Co-Licensee did not report the incident to the Department. In addition, the Licensee and Co-Licensee attended a court hearing on 07/29/25 in which Assistant #1, Assistant #2, and Assistant #3 remained at the facility with the 18 children in care. The Licensee and Co-Licensee did not report it to the Department. On 07/30/25 Licensee, Ofelya Asatryan, informed LPA Calvillo that on 07/29/25 there were 14 children present. On 08/27/25 IB Investigator interviewed Ofelya Asatryan and was informed that there were only 14 children present on 07/29/25. However, it was determined by the local police report that there were 18 children in care on 07/29/25. The Licensee provided false statements to the LPA and the IB Investigator. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to children in care. During today's visit LPM asked Licensee's if they now have staff files and children's files due to 2 Type B citations issued on 09/04/25 by LPA Calvillo during a 3 year annual required visit. LPM informed Licensees that LPM Zaragoza and LPM can issue a clearance letter if the items have been corrected. Per Licensees, they now have only one Assistant. However, Licensees did not have a file for Child #3. Per Licensee, child is in a trial phase where parent is still deciding whether or not to keep child in care. Per Licensees, Child #3 started care on Monday. LPM informed Licensees that they should have children's records and file prior to accepting a child in care. Therefore, LPM and LPA are reciting a Type B for Children's Records. Licensee printed and LIC 9040 Children's roster during the visit due to LPM asking about the number of children enrolled and present during the visit. Licensee did not have it completed and completed it during the visit. The following deficiencies listed on the attached LIC 809D are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 22. (Continue report to page 3...) (Page 3 continued...) A copy of this report shall be provided to the parent/guardian of children currently enrolled by the next business day or immediately upon return. A copy of this report shall also be provided to the parent/guardian of any newly enrolled children for the next 12 months (1 year). The Acknowledgement form must be maintained in each child\342\200\231s file immediately upon receipt from parent. Licensee was provided with a copy of the parent Acknowledgement of Receipt of Licensing Reports Form during this visit. LPA and LPM observed that the facility has surveillance cameras. The Notice of Site Visit (LIC 9213) \342\200\223 must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. Exit interview was conducted with licensees, Asatryan Ofelya and Paul Ouzounian, Licensee, including, but not limited to Provider Rights, Appeal Procedures A copy of the LIC 9224 - Acknowledgement of Receipt of Licensing Reports was provided during this visit.

Citations

8 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION OF A LICENSE OR REGISTRATION

    102402(a)(3)Revocation or Suspension of a License or Registration:(3) Conduct in the operation or maintenance of a family day care home which is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of either an individual in or receiving services from the facility or the people of the State of California.This requirement was not met as evidenced by to Adult #1, who resides at the facility, used a firearm during the hours of operation while children were present. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to children in care.

  • 102417(g)(4)(A)Type A

    102417(g)(4)(A)Operation of a Family Child Care Home(g) The home shall be free from defects or conditions which might endanger a child… (4)(A) Storage areas for poisons, firearms and other dangerous weapons shall be locked.This requirement was not met as evidenced by Adult #1 using a firearm at the facility while children were present during hours of operation. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to children in care. A civil penalty of $500 is being assessed.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    102423 (a)(2) Personal Rights(a) Each child receiving services from a family child care home shall have certain rights that shall not be waived or abridged… (2)To receive safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations...This requirement was not met as evidenced by Adult #1 using a firearm at the facility during the hours of operation while children were present and Assistant #2 placed the18 children in care in the restroom for safety. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to children in care.

  • 102371(a)Type A

    102371(a) Fire Safety Clearance(a)A fire safety clearance approved by the city or county fire department, the district providing fire protection services, or the State Fire Marshal shall be required for a large family child care home.This requirement was not met as evidenced by Licensee and Co-Licensee having 18 children in care which is in violation of their fire clearance granted for 14 children. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to children in care. A civil penalty of $500 is being assessed.

  • 102391(d)Type B

    (d) The licensee shall permit the Department to inspect, audit, and copy children's records or other family child care home records upon demand during normal business hours. Records may be removed if necessary for copying. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensees did not have a file for Child #3. Per Licensee, child is in a trial phase where parent is still deciding whether or not to keep child in care. A Civil Penalty is assest for a repeat violation.

  • REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

  • STAFFING RATIO AND CAPACITY

    102416.5(a) Staffing Ratio and Capacity(a) The capacity specified on the license shall be the maximum number of children for whom care may be provided at any one time.This requirement was not met as evidenced by Licensee and Co-Licensee having 18 children in care on 07/29/25. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to children in care.

  • STAFFING RATIO AND CAPACITY

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 23, 2026 inspection of ASATRYAN AND OUZOUNIAN FAMILY CHILD CARE?

This was a other inspection of ASATRYAN AND OUZOUNIAN FAMILY CHILD CARE on January 23, 2026. 6 citations were issued: 4 Type A (serious) and 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to ASATRYAN AND OUZOUNIAN FAMILY CHILD CARE on January 23, 2026?

Yes, 6 citations were issued (4 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "102402(a)(3)Revocation or Suspension of a License or Registration:(3) Conduct in the operation or maintenance of a famil..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.