Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

CCRC LPC HEAD STARTLicense 197750169
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 08/20/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Justeene Tamayo met with Director, Rosa Ayala Lopez, who granted access to the facility. The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a UIR follow up regarding two new cases of gastrointestinal symptoms from UIR received 08/18/25 and occurred on 08/14/25 . LPA disclosed the purpose of the inspection. Upon arrival, there are 23 children in care, along with 9 teachers and Director. Summary: Facility reported two children in different classrooms have been diagnosed with Gastrointestinal sickness and had a fever and diarrhea. Child #1 went home on 08/14/25. Child #2 is currently associated to the infantl license, and another LIC809 incident report has been created on the infant license for this incident. From interviews conducted, children are back at the center since 08/18/25, and do not have any more gastrointestinal symptoms. Director stated she is still in touch with Department of Public Health and their health team. Center will continue to monitor and disclose any new cases to Palmdale Regional Office. No deficiencies have been cited at this time. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was read and provided to Director on this date, along with a copy of her appeal rights and Notice of Site Visit.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101229(a)(1)Type B

    RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROVIDING CARE AND SUPERVISION

    101229(a)(1): Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision: The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the children's needs.No child(ren) shall be left without the supervision of a teacher at any time...This requirement was not met as evidence by: Child #1 was left unattended for about 2-5 minutes, and managed to exit first gate, which poses a potential health and safety risk to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 20, 2025 inspection of CCRC LPC HEAD START?

This was a other inspection of CCRC LPC HEAD START on August 20, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CCRC LPC HEAD START on August 20, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.