Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Franchesca White and Katrina Chicote conducted an unannounced case management inspection to follow up on an incident that was reported to the Department on 05/08/2023. Upon arrival, LPA met with Marissa Dominguez, who provided LPAs a tour of the facility inside and outside. On 05/08/2023, an incident was self-reported to the Department where a parent made an allegation that their child's personal rights were violated while in care to the Director. The facility reported this incident to the Department within the required 24 hours. During this inspection, LPA interviewed children and staff at facility. Staff members provided log sheets with recent documentation of Child 1 (C1) behaviors. Staff members shared their experience with C1, and how they attempt to manage his behaviors. LPA interviewed C1 by asking qualifying questions, and he answered them, but he was unable to answer any open-ended questions regarding the incident. C1 has limited speech and requires help expressing himself. LPA interviewed C2 and when asked about how he is cared for when he has a bad day he said, "Teacher Lorena gives me time to calm down, or she asks me am I ok. I tell her yeah!" Site Supervisor stated that facility is communicating with the parent to find new ways to manage child's behavior. Site Supervisor will be providing trainings to staff in regards to the Parent Handbook regulations on "The Process and Strategies used to support the behavior management policy". LPA obtained documentation available at time of inspection. Based on the information obtained and LPA observation, LPA determined there will be no deficiencies cited at this time, per California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 12. The Notice of Site Visit (LIC 9213) – must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. Exit interview conducted and report reviewed with, Marissa Dominguez. Report Ends - Page 1 of 1

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 10, 2023 inspection of 92ND & MAIE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER?

This was an other inspection of 92ND & MAIE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER on May 10, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to 92ND & MAIE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER on May 10, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.