complaint·October 21, 2025

Page 2 Child was taken to the hospital and findings per the police report with medical staff findings, symptoms appear consistent with a urinary track infection and possible diaper rash. Per interviews there were no disclosures of anyone observing an incident of a child being touched in the private area by another child. Admission Agreement- Reporting Party (Rp) stated, the licensee did not report the incident to authorized representative. Per interviews the licensee was not a wear of any incident occurring of a child being touched by another child as she never witness that in her day care and per other interviews no one else observed or heard of that happing in the day care, so licensee had nothing to report to the mother. The mother brought it up to the licensee attention due to her child saying to her that " she was touched by a little boy (name unknown) in her private area". Although the allegations may have happened or are valid there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. The evidence to prove something happened is equal to and has just as much convincing weight that it did not happen therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with and given to Lorena Martin, Licensee.