Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ESQUIVEL FAMILY CHILD CARELicense 1980075942 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Interview with staff confirmed that a Child #2’s (CS) hair was cut at the facility. Staff #1 (S1) explained, “[Child #1(C1)] got a hold of the scissors that I use for my 4 year olds…I forgot to take them out and put them up high.” S1 stated that Staff #2 (S2) was assisting another child to keep them safe when C1 cut the other child’s hair. S2 corroborated this description. S1 stated “it was my fault…I was at the post office so I wasn’t here.” When asked if anyone saw the incident, S1 stated no. During S2 interview, they stated that they were by themselves outside with the children. S2 corroborated that they did not see C1 cut C2’s hair. S2 went on to state, “I noticed when we came inside. I didn’t notice outside…I noticed when I saw a little bit of hair on the ground.” When asked if children have access to the scissors, S2 explained “No, well, actually we give them the scissors for their age.” LPA observed the scissors that were used for cutting a C2’s hair. Screenshots of text message conversations regarding the cut hair, between parent and S1, were reviewed. The above information indicates there was a lack of supervision at the facility that resulted in the cutting of a child’s hair by another child, without any staff observation. This is a violation of personal rights due to the scissors provided to children, not being properly supervised during use. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 12 Chapter 1 102423(a)(2) Personal Rights and 102417(a) Operation of a Family Child Care Home), are being cited on the attached deficiencies page. Upon receipt of this report, the Licensee shall post the Notice of Site visit and any licensing report documenting a type “A” deficiency. The report and the Notice of Site visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to maintain posting as required, will result in an immediate $100 civil penalty. A copy of this report shall be provided to the parent/guardian of children currently enrolled by the next business day or immediately upon return. A copy of this report shall also be provided to the parent/guardian of any newly enrolled children for the next 12 months (1 year). The Acknowledgement form must be maintained in each child’s file immediately upon receipt from parent. Licensee was provided with a copy of the parent Acknowledgement of Receipt of Licensing Reports Form during this visit. A copy of the Parent Notification Requirements was also provided to the licensee. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Licensee Maria Esquivel at 3:30pm. Copy of Report provided. END OF REPORT PAGE 2 of 2

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 102417(a)Type A

    OPERATION OF A FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME

    Operation of a Family Child Care Home(a) The licensee shall be present in the home and shall ensure that children in care are supervised at all times.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, Licensee did not ensure that children were under visual supervision at all times, resulting in a child's hair being cut without notice. This was an immediate risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of children in care.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    Personal Rights(2) To receive safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations, furnishings, and equipment.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, Licensee did not ensure that Child #2's personal rights were protected, as Child #1 was allowed to cut child's hair with scissors without staff knowledge. This was an immediate risk to the personal rights of children in care

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 18, 2024 inspection of ESQUIVEL FAMILY CHILD CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of ESQUIVEL FAMILY CHILD CARE on January 18, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to ESQUIVEL FAMILY CHILD CARE on January 18, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "Operation of a Family Child Care Home(a) The licensee shall be present in the home and shall ensure that children in car..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.