Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

AMISTAD PRESCHOOLLicense 198008821
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On July 20, 2021 at 9:30 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mireya García, contacted Site Supervisor, Anahit Shmavonyan, via telephone due to COVID-19 and precautionary measures in order to provide the findings of the Case Management investigation. At 9:49 a.m., the call was transferred into a FaceTime tele-inspection. LPA García discussed the purpose of the call. During this tele-inspection the Site Supervisor took this LPA on a virtual tour of the facility. There were 11 children observed to be present at the facility during this tele-inspection. On March 25, 2021 an incident was self-reported to the Department via telephone by the facility who reported a parent alleges that child disclosed facility staff #1 spanked child while in care. During this investigation, LPA García obtained; documents and conducted interviews with staff & children. Pertaining to the allegation of facility staff #1 spanked child while in care, all interviews conducted with staff determined staff denied observing or having knowledge of any child being hit while in care. In addition, all staff denied having knowledge of any issues with any child in care. All four (4) interviews with day care children made no disclosures. Based on the interviews conducted, at this time there is not enough evidence to support the above allegation. REPORT CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE 1 OF 2 . This agency has investigated the incident reported alleging staff #1 spanked child in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid; Based on interviews conducted; there were no witnesses to the allegation and the child in question was not able to be located for interview, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore at this time the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Should additional information become available in the future, this investigation may be reopened. A Notice of Site Visit was not provided to Site Supervisor, Anahit Shmavonyan since a physical inspection was not conducted. Exit interview was conducted with Site Supervisor, Anahit Shmavonyan via tele-inspection, during which Appeal Rights were verbally explained to Site Supervisor. A copy of this report has been signed by LPA García. This report, along with a copy of the Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) will be scanned via e-mail to Site Supervisor, Anahit Shmavonyan, who understands that an electronic “Read Receipt” and/or confirmation of receipt of the e-mail confirms receipt of the report and constitutes an electronic signature. The facility representative was provided with the mailing address to the Monterey Park Regional Office (1000 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 200B, Monterey Park, CA 91754) and agrees to send a copy of the signed LIC 809 reports by email to LPA and mail originals forms to the office. END OF REPORT: PAGE 2 OF 2.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    Personal Rights: (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (3) To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation, ridicule, coercion, threat, mental abuse or other actions of a punitive nature including but not limited to: interference with functions of daily living including eating, sleeping or toileting; or withholding of shelter, clothing, medication or aids to physical functioning. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPAs interviews conducted with staff reveal, disclosures were made regarding a Personal Rights violation conducted by Staff #1. Disclosures indicated that Staff #1 forced children to use the restroom even when they did not need to use restroom. This poses a potential health and safety risk to children in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 20, 2021 inspection of AMISTAD PRESCHOOL?

This was an other inspection of AMISTAD PRESCHOOL on July 20, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to AMISTAD PRESCHOOL on July 20, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.