Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

of each child that is signed into the facility. LPA White observed staff participate in the toileting of each child and a hand off to the teacher assigned to conduct the health check for the child before transitioning to circle time. All observations proved that staff provide a clean, safe environment for the children, and ensure that communication happens during the hand off of children from one staff member to another. Based on the staff interviews it was determined that six out of six staff members had a working understanding of the goals and expectations the facility has for providing care to the children from the beginning of the program day until the moments before children are picked up. Staff stated that the parents are very happy with the level of care the children receive. Staff consistently stated that health checks are performed at the beginning of each program with duties and responsibilities of health checks and toileting alternated weekly between staff. Based on record review, LPA White reviewed training documentation provided from administration to all staff with dates of when trainings were held. All current staff participated in those trainings consisting of the level of care children are expected to receive. LPA White also observed the employee handbook, 3 months of health checks conducted by staff with random identification and questioning of specific checks and proof of communication with parents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews there is not a preponderance of evidence to support the allegation did or did not happen. Therefore the allegation concerning the level of care is UNSUBSTANTIATED. There will be no deficiencies cited in accordance with California Title 22 regulations. The report was reviewed with facility representative, Lucina Mena (Program Director). A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to post will result in a civil penalty of $100. A copy of the report and appeal rights was given to facility representative, Lucina Mena (Program Director). .............................................Report Ends Here 2 of 2 Pages.............................................

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 12, 2025 inspection of CURTIS CARE INFANT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM?

This was a complaint inspection of CURTIS CARE INFANT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM on September 12, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CURTIS CARE INFANT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM on September 12, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.