Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

KIDS KLUB SAN GABRIEL / ROSEMEADLicense 1980141681 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

They explained that the facility tablets alert staff that diapers need to be checked and staff have to manually enter that a diaper was checked/changed. Specifically, Child #1’s diaper log for 01/28/2025 was provided during the investigation as evidence which noted that child was dropped off/signed in at 8:42am, changed for wet diaper at 9:37am, and then changed again at 11:08 for another wet diaper. All staff interviewed confirmed the diaper changing procedure. On 1/28/2025, C1 had an ouch report created at 11:25am for irritated skin. On 03/12/2025 the complaint was delivered as unsubstantiated. During an inspection by LPA Ayala, conducted on 05/01/2025, it was disclosed that the same staff previously interviewed were given a write up by administrative staff for failure to change C1’s diaper. The staff who received write ups admitted that they had not changed the child’s diaper as there was “miscommunication.” The staff explained that the child was not changed but was marked as changed. According to the write up, C1 was away from the group in another area of the facility during the regular diaper changing time. Staff #6 had entered that the diaper had been changed on the tablet, though they didn’t change the diaper themselves or confirm with Staff #3 that the diaper had been changed. Staff#6 assumed that Staff #3 had changed C1’s diaper, since according to Staff#6, C1 only feels comfortable with Staff #3. LPA Ayala obtained copies of the write ups for Staff #2, #3, and #6. Write ups were for incident dated 01/28/2025, and explained that staff had logged a diaper change that was not actually completed. The write up also documents that the Ouch Report issued to C1’s parent failed to properly document that C1 had not received a diaper change. Write Up for Staff #6 specifically says, “On Tuesday, January 28, 2025, you logged that you completed two diaper changes on a child; one ‘Wet’ diaper at 9:37am and on ‘Wet’ diaper at 11:08am. You did not complete these two diaper changes. The child did not receive any diaper change at 9:37am…” All write ups were dated 03/07/2025 which was prior to LPA Tcheng’s initial delivered findings that took place on 03/12/2025. New information discovered supports that Kids Klub administrative staff failed to provide new information disclosed to them regarding complaint alleging that C1 was not changed which resulted in a diaper rash needing medical attention. Based on LPA Tcheng and Ayala’s observations, interviews, record review and new information obtained, the original complaint is being amended and a new finding are being issued. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore the above allegation is being changed from UNSUBSTANTIATED to SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 12 Chapter 1 101223(2) Personal Rights, is being cited on the attached deficiencies page). LPA Ayala informed Director, Arianna Alonzo that this report dated 06/10/2025, documents One Type A citation, which shall be posted for 30 consecutive days as there is an immediate risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of children in care. Also, LPA Ayala informed the Director to provide a copy of this licensing report dated 06/10/2025, that documents any Type A citation, to parent/guardians of all children currently enrolled by the next business day or the next day the children are in care, and to any newly enrolled parents/guardians for 12 months from the date of this report. A signed Acknowledgement of Receipt of Licensing Report (LIC9224), or other written statement, must be placed in the child's file for verification. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with director, Arianna Alonzo. Plan of correction developed and copy of report was provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION

    Conduct Inimical: Conduct in the operation or maintenance of a child care center which is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of either an individual in or receiving services from the facility or the people of the State of California. The requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the facility was not forthcoming with the new information having to deal with an open complaint investigation. This poses an immediate health and safety risk for children in care.

  • 101223(2)Type A

    Personal Rights: The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment to meet his/her needs. This requriement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and record review, C1's diaper was not changed as there was a miscommunication between staff who logged a diaper change when it had not been done. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 10, 2025 inspection of KIDS KLUB SAN GABRIEL / ROSEMEAD?

This was a complaint inspection of KIDS KLUB SAN GABRIEL / ROSEMEAD on June 10, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to KIDS KLUB SAN GABRIEL / ROSEMEAD on June 10, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "Conduct Inimical: Conduct in the operation or maintenance of a child care center which is inimical to the health, morals..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.