Complaint·September 5, 2023

LPA conducted interview with Licensee, who disclosed that Adult # 1 mentioned is Licensee’s relative, who is getting medical treatments and spends time in their home when they have appointments. When Adult # 1 is in the home there’s no day care children present. Regarding Adult # 2 Licensee, disclosed that they spent time with Adult # 2 during the weekend and not at the facility. LPA did observed Adult # 1 in the home twice, both times day care was closed, and no children were present . LPA did not observed Adult # 2 in the home. LPA conducted interviews with children. Child # 1 disclosed that they know adult # 1 and referred to them as “aunt”- additionally child # 1 stated that they did not know if adult # 1 lived in the home because they are not present when they are there. Child # 2 and # 3 corroborated that they do not know adult # 1 and have not seen any other adults in the home besides Licensee. All 3 children corroborated that they do not know who adult # 2 is. Parent interviews had no disclosures, all parents corroborated that they do not have any concerns This agency has investigated the complaint alleging: Licensee allowed uncleared adults to reside in the home. Based upon the evidence as presented above, the allegation has been determined to be Unsubstantiated. A finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore at this time the above allegation is unsubstantiated. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Licensee , Jackie Tovar. -----------------------------------------pg. 2 of 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------