Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

HENDERSON FAMILY CHILD CARELicense 198019922
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Susann Sanchez and Ashley Calderon conducted a follow up complaint inspection. LPAs met with Licensee, Robin Henderson and informed her of the above alleged allegations. LPAs toured facility both indoors and outdoors. There was 5 children and 1 infant present during inspection. Licensee's assistant was also present. During the investigation LPA interviewed the licensee, children, staff, and parents. LPA obtained copies of supporting documentation mentation such as a California ID with address above. LPAs toured the house on 05/31/2024 and LPAs observed that licensee has a bedroom at the facility and photos where taken. There were inconsistencies during interviews with children and staff. Staff #1, stated that she doesn't know if licensee lives. Child #1, named adults that live in the home and Licensee was not named. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted with Licensee Henderson. The Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for thirty (30) consecutive days.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 102370(k)Type A

    Based on LPA Calderon and Sanchez observated male adult entering the facility; LPA's reviewed personnel report individual was not cleared/ associated, Interview with Licensee and Staff Assistant present stated there is a visitor staying in the home, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [1] out of [1] persons which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 102416(c)Type B

    PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS

    Based on observation and records review LPA Calderon and Sanchez obvserved Licensee's CPR/First Aid that is not valid under Title 22 regulations, company used is not a EMSA vendor, and assistant did not have proof of CPR/ First Aid, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [2] out of [2] [persons] which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • INFANT SAFE SLEEP

    Based on LPA's observation Licensee had sleep log for Child #2 and #6 , sleep log was dated June 3-7th, 2024, sleep log is inconsistant for days child is present at the facility, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [2] out of [2] [persons] which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 10, 2024 inspection of HENDERSON FAMILY CHILD CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of HENDERSON FAMILY CHILD CARE on July 10, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to HENDERSON FAMILY CHILD CARE on July 10, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.