complaint·July 31, 2024

Licensee, S1, S2, C2-C4 and P4 who did not corroborate with the allegation. Licensee and S2 disclosed children in diapers are checked and changed every 2 hours and as needed throughout the day. LPA also interviewed P4 who did not provide corroborating statements. LPA interviewed W1 who disclosed that, at times they would assist RP with picking up C1. According to W1, on at least two different occasions, C1s diaper was significantly soiled. W1 alleged that W2 would corroborate that C1’s diaper was soiled, however, calls were not returned during attempts to interview W2. W1 was also not sure of the dates C1 was picked up. During the course of interviews and based on the evidence obtained during the course of the investigation, the evidence does not support, nor disprove the above allegation that Licensee left day-care child in a soiled diaper. Therefore, the allegation has been determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Licensee, Maura Lopez.